Skip to main content

Call for targeted safety measures to prevent road deaths among young drivers

Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety. More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group. A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council
January 26, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety.

More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group.  A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) indicates young people continue to face a unique combination of factors that leads to a higher rate of collisions and deaths.

Young riders are particularly at risk, with deaths for moped riders peaking between the ages of 15 and 17 and for motorcycle riders between 18 and 24.

A lack of experience on the road also means that young people are worse at anticipating and reacting to hazards and less aware of how best to drive and ride in particular road conditions and situations. They also face a range of distractions and impairments, including exposure to alcohol and drugs, fatigue, pressure from peer-age passengers and mobile phone use.

They tend to drive smaller and older vehicles, which often have a lower crashworthiness star rating and lack the safety technologies featured in newer models. The use of seat belts and protective clothing is also poor amongst young people.

The UK, which has a minimum solo driving age of 17, has a good overall road safety record but as in many other European countries, young motorcyclists and drivers form a disproportionately high percentage of deaths.

Most other countries in Europe do not allow young people to drive unsupervised until they are 18, with longer periods between beginning to learn to drive and driving solo, allowing them to build up more driving experience before taking their test.

However, the UK has also been leading the way when it comes to hazard perception testing and telematics-based insurance for young drivers.

The report makes a number of key recommendations for urgent action including: Better enforcement of speed and drink-drive limits, seat belt wearing and mobile phone use and lowering the alcohol limit for young drivers. It also recommends encouraging more accompanied driving to help young people gain experience; adopting licensing systems that encourage young people to gain experience while limiting high-risk activities such as driving at night and with passengers and a greater focus on safety initiatives. The report also suggests enabling and encouraging young people to use safer cars.

Commenting on the report, David Davies, executive director of the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, called on policymakers to commit to introducing proven measures that can help reduce the risks.

He said, “The UK has led the way in Europe in aspects of improving the safety of young road users, including hazard perception testing and telematics-based insurance. PACTS welcome the current proposals by the Government and DVSA to change the driving test and improve motorcycle training.”

However, he said more could and should be done including encouraging young people to use safer cars, get more experience before taking the test and lowering the drink-drive limit for younger drivers.

He concluded, “Traffic law enforcement of speed, seat-belt wearing, mobile phone use and drink/drug driving are particularly important to the safety of young road users. The reduction in police enforcement is very worrying.”

Related Content

  • New name offers new solutions
    November 26, 2013
    Pete Goldin examines Nokia’s rationale for combining its location services, digital mapping and other capabilities under the HERE brand. While it has divested itself of its mobile phone business to Microsoft, Nokia has kept hold of its HERE business unit and brand which incorporates the company’s location services with digital mapping and other capabilities. The creation of HERE is much more than rebranding as its services are heading off the map and into the cloud. “HERE offers the first location cloud
  • Australia trials shortened cost benefit evaluation
    January 13, 2017
    A shortened and tailored cost benefit assessment is helping show the worth of C-ITS in Australia. An Australian ‘rapid cost-benefit assessment’ method, introduced to help prepare the ground for co-operative ITS (C-ITS) deployment and showcased at the ITS World Congress in Melbourne, has generated encouraging results.
  • Intel investing in vehicles’ connected future
    November 30, 2012
    Prospects for a vision of vehicles fully connected to traffic information, safety and entertainment services are being boosted by a $100 million investment from Intel. Pete Goldin reports. Hear the name Intel and what comes to mind is processing power. What may not be realised is that Intel is positioned to become a major player in the automotive technologies market, including connected vehicle technology. To strengthen this position, the company’s investment arm, Intel Capital, has established a $100 milli
  • Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    January 30, 2012
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was