Skip to main content

Call for targeted safety measures to prevent road deaths among young drivers

Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety. More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group. A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council
January 26, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety.

More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group.  A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) indicates young people continue to face a unique combination of factors that leads to a higher rate of collisions and deaths.

Young riders are particularly at risk, with deaths for moped riders peaking between the ages of 15 and 17 and for motorcycle riders between 18 and 24.

A lack of experience on the road also means that young people are worse at anticipating and reacting to hazards and less aware of how best to drive and ride in particular road conditions and situations. They also face a range of distractions and impairments, including exposure to alcohol and drugs, fatigue, pressure from peer-age passengers and mobile phone use.

They tend to drive smaller and older vehicles, which often have a lower crashworthiness star rating and lack the safety technologies featured in newer models. The use of seat belts and protective clothing is also poor amongst young people.

The UK, which has a minimum solo driving age of 17, has a good overall road safety record but as in many other European countries, young motorcyclists and drivers form a disproportionately high percentage of deaths.

Most other countries in Europe do not allow young people to drive unsupervised until they are 18, with longer periods between beginning to learn to drive and driving solo, allowing them to build up more driving experience before taking their test.

However, the UK has also been leading the way when it comes to hazard perception testing and telematics-based insurance for young drivers.

The report makes a number of key recommendations for urgent action including: Better enforcement of speed and drink-drive limits, seat belt wearing and mobile phone use and lowering the alcohol limit for young drivers. It also recommends encouraging more accompanied driving to help young people gain experience; adopting licensing systems that encourage young people to gain experience while limiting high-risk activities such as driving at night and with passengers and a greater focus on safety initiatives. The report also suggests enabling and encouraging young people to use safer cars.

Commenting on the report, David Davies, executive director of the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, called on policymakers to commit to introducing proven measures that can help reduce the risks.

He said, “The UK has led the way in Europe in aspects of improving the safety of young road users, including hazard perception testing and telematics-based insurance. PACTS welcome the current proposals by the Government and DVSA to change the driving test and improve motorcycle training.”

However, he said more could and should be done including encouraging young people to use safer cars, get more experience before taking the test and lowering the drink-drive limit for younger drivers.

He concluded, “Traffic law enforcement of speed, seat-belt wearing, mobile phone use and drink/drug driving are particularly important to the safety of young road users. The reduction in police enforcement is very worrying.”

Related Content

  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 1, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become. ITS Stockholm in 2009 and the Cooperative Mobility Showcase event which took place alongside Intertraffic in Amsterdam in March this year both featured live, on-street demonstrations of safety and driver information applications that used Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications,
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 6, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become
  • ITF diagnoses South Asia’s breathing difficulties
    August 26, 2022
    One of the world’s fastest-growing regions faces major transport sector decisions if it is to avoid spiralling emissions problems in coming decades. Alan Dron takes a look at a new report on Asia from the International Transport Forum
  • Are truck bans the wrong move in the battle for air quality
    June 29, 2016
    Low emission zones and heavy goods vehicles’ access to city centres may at first glance appear attractive but how effective are such controls? Jon Masters reviews emerging trends across Europe. Around 1,700 European cities have implemented low emission zones (LEZs) and in addition some have restricted city centre access for heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). Even those that restrict HGV access, such as Paris and Rome, allow exemptions at certain times and for particular classes of vehicle. But with what effect?