Skip to main content

C2ES: how electrified transportation can benefit low-income communities

City officials can help improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and cost savings to cities and their disadvantaged communities through taking steps to speed the deployment of zero- and low-emission electric vehicles (EVs). The findings come from a new brief from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) which provides resources on helping cities evaluate the benefits of electrified transportation. Called “Electrified Transportation for All,” the report covers the expansion of the
November 6, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

City officials can help improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and cost savings to cities and their disadvantaged communities through taking steps to speed the deployment of zero- and low-emission electric vehicles (EVs). The findings come from a new brief from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) which provides resources on helping cities evaluate the benefits of electrified transportation. 

Called “Electrified Transportation for All,” the report covers the expansion of the technology from individually-owned – and shared - electric passenger vehicles and both transit and school buses.

The brief lays out information that city officials need to better evaluate financial and environmental benefits such as the total cost of vehicle ownership, including initial purchase, fuel, operating and maintenance costs. In addition, it covers the costs associated with emissions-related health impacts, such as elevated risks for cancer, asthma, emphysema, heart disease and inhibited child development.

Recommended programs and technologies include transit authority transitions to zero-emission, all-electric buses that reduce overall roadway emissions and initially focus on vulnerable communities. Electrified school buses to protect children from adverse health impacts associated with diesel-powered buses. Additionally, expanding access to public EV charging stations to provide infrastructure that promotes and reduces costs of individual ownership. Car-share programs, like the BlueLA program in Los Angeles, that utilize shared electric vehicles that disburse the cost of ownership and eliminate tailpipe emissions are also included.

Low-income communities generally experience more severe health effects from vehicle tailpipe emissions due to often being located near major roadways.

Bob Perciasepe, C2ES, president, said: “Cities are taking the lead in reducing carbon emissions and protecting their communities because they can’t afford to wait for stronger federal action. With low-income communities already suffering a disproportionate share of harmful air pollution, it’s important that cities have the tools they need to electrify city buses and expand vehicle charging infrastructure."

Related Content

  • EU offers vision of mobility
    March 26, 2021
    Major changes are in the air for ITS in Europe: José Diez of ERF considers what the European Commission’s newly-released policy strategy for sustainable and smart mobility will mean
  • Uber clean-up - those all-important facts and figures
    September 11, 2020
    Ride-hailing giant says it can switch to all-electric vehicles 'in any major city' by 2030
  • Microgrids & the new power generation
    August 31, 2021
    Public transportation agencies are turning to microgrids to provide critical resilience in the event of local and regional power interruptions. Gordon Feller looks at projects in Maryland, New Jersey and Massachusetts
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London