Skip to main content

C2ES: how electrified transportation can benefit low-income communities

City officials can help improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and cost savings to cities and their disadvantaged communities through taking steps to speed the deployment of zero- and low-emission electric vehicles (EVs). The findings come from a new brief from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) which provides resources on helping cities evaluate the benefits of electrified transportation. Called “Electrified Transportation for All,” the report covers the expansion of the
November 6, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

City officials can help improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and cost savings to cities and their disadvantaged communities through taking steps to speed the deployment of zero- and low-emission electric vehicles (EVs). The findings come from a new brief from the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) which provides resources on helping cities evaluate the benefits of electrified transportation. 

Called “Electrified Transportation for All,” the report covers the expansion of the technology from individually-owned – and shared - electric passenger vehicles and both transit and school buses.

The brief lays out information that city officials need to better evaluate financial and environmental benefits such as the total cost of vehicle ownership, including initial purchase, fuel, operating and maintenance costs. In addition, it covers the costs associated with emissions-related health impacts, such as elevated risks for cancer, asthma, emphysema, heart disease and inhibited child development.

Recommended programs and technologies include transit authority transitions to zero-emission, all-electric buses that reduce overall roadway emissions and initially focus on vulnerable communities. Electrified school buses to protect children from adverse health impacts associated with diesel-powered buses. Additionally, expanding access to public EV charging stations to provide infrastructure that promotes and reduces costs of individual ownership. Car-share programs, like the BlueLA program in Los Angeles, that utilize shared electric vehicles that disburse the cost of ownership and eliminate tailpipe emissions are also included.

Low-income communities generally experience more severe health effects from vehicle tailpipe emissions due to often being located near major roadways.

Bob Perciasepe, C2ES, president, said: “Cities are taking the lead in reducing carbon emissions and protecting their communities because they can’t afford to wait for stronger federal action. With low-income communities already suffering a disproportionate share of harmful air pollution, it’s important that cities have the tools they need to electrify city buses and expand vehicle charging infrastructure."

Related Content

  • Bristol to test new green bus technology
    January 9, 2015
    The city of Bristol in the UK is to pilot the latest green technology for buses thanks to a US$1.5 million grant from the Government to coincide with the city’s year as European Green Capital. Baroness Kramer, minister of State for Transport, announced today that Bristol will receive funding to purchase a number of new hybrid buses which can switch from diesel to electric automatically in low emission zones. The grant from the green bus fund will be used to purchase a number of hybrid buses with geo-f
  • Carbon finance delivers critical support to mass transit schemes
    February 2, 2012
    David Crawford investigates carbon finance in transport. World Bank carbon finance grants are delivering critical support to major mass transit deployments in emerging and developing economies. Only recently operative in the transport sector, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM, see panel) is designed to generate additional income streams and improve internal rates of return on projects funded from public- and private-sector sources.
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft