Skip to main content

AV ride-sharing services must appeal to motivations and overcome barriers

Autonomous vehicle (AV) ride-sharing services need to appeal to user motivations and overcome potential barriers or concerns, if they are to be successful, according to research conducted by Merge Greenwich. The study revealed that, on balance, ride-sharing presents a greater barrier-to-uptake than AV technology. 85% of respondents indicated a willingness to use an AV in the future, suggesting that the technology is the aspect of the service that excites them the most. 46% are willing to use a ride-shar
April 18, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Autonomous vehicle (AV) ride-sharing services need to appeal to user motivations and overcome potential barriers or concerns, if they are to be successful, according to research conducted by Merge Greenwich. The study revealed that, on balance, ride-sharing presents a greater barrier-to-uptake than AV technology.


85% of respondents indicated a willingness to use an AV in the future, suggesting that the technology is the aspect of the service that excites them the most. 46% are willing to use a ride-sharing service for various types of journeys once or twice a week, which dropped to 26% when participants considered using a ride-sharing service three or more times a week.

The participants’ readiness to accept the technology was based on the assumption that regulators would require AV systems to be proven through testing before being deployed for commercial use and available to the public.

Findings also showed that 15% of participants feel deterred from adopting the service based on concerns relating to privacy and security. Sharing a journey in a small space implied different social rules compared to a tube carriage or bus.

Merge Greenwich recommends that these services should be designed to address user reservations on sharing a journey with strangers. Adopting public transport style seating and payment mechanisms may help to meet rider expectations.

Key decision-making criteria of cost, safety, convenience and sustainability will also need to be satisfied.

The consortium suggests that the service’s greatest opportunity is to target areas which are underserved by public transport, which could benefit the transport network by reducing congestion and emissions. Merge Greenwich also proposes that the government should take a leading role in educating all road users on AVs. In addition, all passengers will need to have the ability to contact the service provider while other riders will require an onboard steward that could also help with luggage and accessibility.

A full copy of the report is available %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external here false https://mergegreenwich.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2018/04/MERGE-Greenwich-Consumer-attitudes-to-AV-ride-sharing-3.pdf false false%>.

Related Content

  • MaaS Market London conference looks at first/last mile
    February 13, 2019
    Next month’s MaaS Market conference in London will host a session dedicated to first/last mile travel within multimodal trips delivered through Mobility as a Service (MaaS) platforms. The provision of first/last mile connections is crucial if MaaS is to provide travellers with a convenient alternative to using private cars for every journey. In the session, Richard Corbett from micro scooter provider Bird, and Katy Medlock of peer-to-peer car share company Drivy, will be joined by Amsterdam-based researc
  • Didi Chuxing issues public apology for death of female passenger
    September 3, 2018
    Chinese ride-sharing company Didi Chuxing has blamed its own ‘vanity’ for lapses in safety which led to the rape and killing of a 20-year-old female passenger. The firm issued a public apology for the incident which took place on 28 August and says it will now prioritise safety over growth. In an emailed statement, Didi founder Cheng Wei and president Jean Liu say: "We see clearly this is because our vanity overtook our original belief. We raced non-stop, riding on the force of breathless expansion and
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo