Skip to main content

Australian report calls for a shift in infrastructure development

The first policy outlook paper issued by the Better Infrastructure Initiative at the University of Sydney, Re-establishing Australia's Global Infrastructure Leadership, claims that Australia could save billions of dollars by focusing infrastructure spending on existing infrastructure networks. The report found that low innovation, declining productivity and a failure to positively engage customers are key factors holding back the nation's infrastructure. It recommends greater transparency, better stan
February 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
The first policy outlook paper issued by the Better Infrastructure Initiative at the University of Sydney, Re-establishing Australia's Global Infrastructure Leadership, claims that Australia could save billions of dollars by focusing infrastructure spending on existing infrastructure networks.

The report found that low innovation, declining productivity and a failure to positively engage customers are key factors holding back the nation's infrastructure.

It recommends greater transparency, better standards for infrastructure governance, a shifting of priorities towards customers and wherever possible the use of a market-driven approach to improve infrastructure performance.

"Instead of always looking to build big things, we should be focusing too on the smaller but often overlooked projects to decongest and de-bottleneck existing infrastructure,” said Garry Bowditch, executive director of the Initiative. “We can pump tens of billions of dollars into infrastructure, but there are other things we can do that would relieve the same problem if we actually look at the root cause of the issue."

"Too often, customers are not strongly engaged in the infrastructure project selection process, and are offered infrastructure on a 'take it or leave it' basis. The paper concludes that where governments facilitate the development of markets and bring service providers and customers closer together, greater emphasis is placed on common sense infrastructure outcomes," Bowditch said.

The Better Infrastructure Initiative is a partnership between University of Sydney's John Grill Centre for Project Leadership and the National Australia Bank (NAB).

"This report is the first of several papers aimed at lifting the planning and management capabilities of government and business," said Bowditch.

Related Content

  • January 19, 2012
    Road user charging - replacing the gas tax with a mileage based fee
    Oregon Department of Transportation's James Whitty discusses his state's progress with VMT fee-based charging. Back in 2001, the state of Oregon stole a lead on the rest of the US when it decided to address the need to do something about the gas tax and its decreasing ability to fund highway construction and upkeep. Recognising that a dwindling pot of money could only shrink further as vehicles became more fuelefficient, Oregon's Legislative Assembly passed laws which led to the setting up, by the state's g
  • December 21, 2021
    Sharing data creates value - IRF Geneva
    A report on the sharing of data to improve mobility has come up with a policy framework for the industry. Susanna Zammataro, director general of the International Road Federation in Geneva, explains to Adam Hill why this can empower companies and organisations
  • March 17, 2017
    Europe’s road safety gains have stagnated EU
    Europe will fail to meet its road death targets as enforcement budgets are slashed and drivers face an epidemic of distractions. The European Union will not achieve its aim of halving the number of people killed on its roads each year by 2020, delegates to Tispol’s (the organisation of European traffic police) annual conference in Manchester were told. “The target will be missed because there was only a 17% decrease in road fatalities across Europe between 2010 and 2015 when [the rate of reduction] should h
  • December 5, 2018
    MaaS will be adopted quicker in Europe than in the US: here’s why
    A new report suggests that MaaS will be implemented more quickly in Europe than in the US – but why should this be? Ben Spencer examines the arguments