Skip to main content

Australia ‘must choose an electric car charging norm’

According to Professor Thomas Braunl, director of the renewable energy vehicle project at the University of Western Australia, it’s time for Australia to choose a standard for vehicle charging connectors. When the university started Australia’s first electric vehicle trial in Western Australia in 2010, there were no manufacturer-built cars available and locally built conversions had to be used. As of today, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Holden and Tesla offer electric cars in the Australian market. Nearly all inte
September 19, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
According to Professor Thomas Braunl, director of the renewable energy vehicle project at the University of Western Australia, it’s time for Australia to choose a standard for vehicle charging connectors.

When the university started Australia’s first electric vehicle trial in Western Australia in 2010, there were no manufacturer-built cars available and locally built conversions had to be used. As of today, 4962 Mitsubishi, 838 Nissan, Holden and Tesla offer electric cars in the Australian market. Nearly all international car manufacturers will follow in 2014 and 2015.

Charging networks have been established as well. Perth has a public charging network of around thirty 7kW AC stations. There is a similar sized network in Melbourne, but less in other capital cities.

The two most prominent charging station types for AC charging are IEC 62196 Type 1, or SAE J1772, used in the US and Japan, which have a split-phase single phase power grid,  and IEC 62196 Type 2, or Mennekes, used in Europe, which has a three-phase grid, as does Australia. Because Australia has not yet adopted an EV charging connector standard, a mix of stations is currently being installed.

Although Australia is still dealing with a very low number of charging stations overall, they do set a precedent. Whatever happens now will determine Australia’s EV charging future.  The availability of stations will influence car manufacturers when deciding which EV type to export to Australia.

Getting two different types of cars is not helpful for the early adopters of electric vehicles, nor for the operators of charging networks. Eventually one standard will prevail and non-compliant stations and cars will have to be converted at a significant cost.

Professor Braunl is of the opinion that Australia’s choice should obviously be Type 2, even more so since three-phase connections improve the grid balance. He says, “Maybe inductive charging will finally eliminate the choice by eliminating connectors altogether? We’ll see at the end of the decade.”

Related Content

  • September 26, 2012
    PDTS highlight Wallbox vehicle charging system at ITS World Congress
    Austrian company PDTS will highlight its Wallbox PC 310/320, an intelligent, network- and customer-friendly electric vehicle (EV) charging system for the private and semi-public sector. Using type 1 and 2 e-mobility connectors to ensure broad charge compatibility, the configuration of the PC 310/320 is standard IEC 61851-1 compliant with Mode 3 charging, enabling safe and convenient charging of electric vehicles at speeds much faster than conventional electrical outlets.
  • October 22, 2014
    Using electricity to power road freight
    Next year sees the start of the first real-life electrified road system for transporting freight. Worldwide freight transportation is predicted to double by 2050 but despite expansion of global rail infrastructure only one third of this additional freight transport can be handled by trains. This means that the largest proportion of freight transport will continue to be by road and as a result, experts expect global CO2 emissions from road freight traffic to more than double by 2050.
  • January 10, 2013
    Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort
  • January 26, 2012
    What's next for traffic management and data collection?
    As the technologies and stakeholders in traffic management evolve, what can we expect to see happening in the coming years? For many, the conversation of the moment is just how, and how far, the newer technologies and services provided principally by the private sector should be allowed to intrude into the realms of traffic management.