Skip to main content

ARTBA: voters want transportation investment

The preliminary US election results showed that voters in 22 states approved ballot measures that will provide US$201 billion in funding extensions and new revenue for state and local transportation projects, according to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association’s Transportation (ARTBA).
November 11, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

The preliminary US election results showed that voters in 22 states approved ballot measures that will provide US$201 billion in funding extensions and new revenue for state and local transportation projects, according to the 5565 American Road & Transportation Builders Association’s Transportation (ARTBA).

Analysis by the ARTBA’s Transportation Investment Advocacy Center (ARTBA-TIAC) indicated that 69 per cent of the 280 transportation funding ballot measures up for vote across the nation were approved, with results still pending for seven local areas.

Voters in California approved 15 of 26 transportation ballot measures worth US$133 billion, including a one cent sales tax in Los Angeles that will provide US$120 billion over 40 years for local road, bridge and transit projects. California voters also rejected a state-wide measure that would have required any public infrastructure bond over US$2 billion to go on the ballot for voter approval.

Voters in Illinois and New Jersey passed transportation tax ‘lockbox’ measures to prohibit state lawmakers from diverting transportation user fee revenue to non-transportation uses. Maine approved a state-wide transportation bond issue for US$100 million and Rhode Island voters approved US$70 million in bonds for port investment.

In Washington state, voters approved a 25-year, US$54 billion revenue package that would support expanding Sound Transit light rail and bus routes. The package included a bond issue and adjustments in property, sales and motor vehicle taxes.

In Missouri, a state-wide initiative to increase the state’s cigarette tax to raise an estimated US$100 million annually for transportation investments failed. Voters in Georgia approved local sales tax increases that would raise nearly US$4 billion for road and transit projects in the metropolitan Atlanta area.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Smoothing the path to reducing traffic pollution
    October 22, 2014
    David Crawford reviews a new approach to traffic smoothing. A key objective for the Californian city of Bakersfield’s upgraded traffic operations centre (TOC), which opened in June 2014, is to help improve living conditions in a region with one of the worst air quality problems in the US. The TOC is speeding up the smoothing of traffic flows by delivering faster and better-informed traffic signal retiming and synchronisation.
  • Atlanta launches Smart Corridor demonstration project
    September 15, 2017
    The City of Atlanta, Georgia, in partnership with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and Georgia Tech, has launched a smart city project on a major east-west artery in the city. The North Avenue Smart Corridor demonstration project, funded by the Renew Atlanta Infrastructure Bond, will deploy the latest technology in adaptive signal systems for a safer, more efficient flow of transit, personal vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians
  • California pilots road charge as alternative to fuel tax
    October 17, 2016
    As the California Road Charge Pilot Program enters its fourth month, participant feedback indicates that 65 per cent of 3,191 respondents surveyed are satisfied with the program as a whole. The nine-month pilot was launched on 1 July 2016 by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to test a pay-by-the-mile road funding model as a possible replacement to the fuel tax. Over 5,000 vehicles state-wide are enrolled in the pilot, testing various road charging reporting methods to compare how the
  • Time for a rethink on road user charging
    February 1, 2012
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes