Skip to main content

Applanix launch platform to speed up AV development programs

Appllanix has launched its Autonomy Development Platform to provide automakers, tier 1 vehicle supplier and truck makers with the hardware, software, engineering and integration services necessary to accelerate development programs for on-road and off-road autonomous vehicles. It combines Applanix’s GNSS-inertial positioning technologies with customized integration and engineering services for each stage of the development process.
January 25, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Appllanix has launched its Autonomy Development Platform to provide automakers, tier 1 vehicle supplier and truck makers with the hardware, software, engineering and integration services necessary to accelerate development programs for on-road and off-road autonomous vehicles. It combines Applanix’s GNSS-inertial positioning technologies with customized integration and engineering services for each stage of the development process.


According to Louis Nastro, Applanix’s director of land products, the platform delivers a customizable navigation solution which works with all sensors, multiple cameras, Lidar, radar and ultrasonic sensors and with all vehicle types at every stages in the commercialisation cycle. It enables highly accurate assessments of the full 360-degree environment around the vehicle to produce a robust representation, including static and dynamic objects, critical for successful vehicle autonomy.

Steve Woolven, president of Applanix, said: “Applanix has been committed to meeting the needs of autonomous vehicle manufacturers for more than a decade, going back to our success at the Darpa Challenges.  In addition, our expertise in autonomous technologies is part of an extensive portfolio of 1985 Trimble solutions for automation and vehicle autonomy, which began more than three decades ago. Our refined positioning algorithms and expertise with sensor fusion and mobile robotic technologies enable us to provide a development platform that delivers the required performance and reliability for manufacturers to develop and produce self-driving vehicles for all environments and tasks.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • 5G or not 5G?
    April 16, 2019
    Just a few years ago, there was only one solution in terms of communications protocols for delivering vehicle connectivity. Now, road operators and vehicle manufacturers face choices – including a moral choice, perhaps. Jason Barnes looks at the current state of play There is a debate raging in the ITS world over future communications protocols. Asfinag, Austria’s national strategic road operator, has announced it will from 2020 be using ITS-G5 to support cooperative ITS (C-ITS) applications (‘First thin
  • 2getthere calls for stricter AV regulations
    April 13, 2018
    Authorities will have to introduce strict regulations to ensure the safe introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) on public roads, according to a white paper published by Utrecht-based company 2getthere. Called Safety in Autonomous Transit, the report states that authorities should set more firm conditions on road safety, reliability and availability of these vehicles and also for the spatial planning of public areas where AVs operate. 2getthere highlights that governments will have to set tighter
  • Radar reinforces detection efficiency
    March 16, 2016
    Radar can have distinct advantages in some transport-related situations as Colin Sowman found out during a visit to Navtech Radar. Despite tremendous advances in machine vision techniques, the accuracy and reliability of camera-based detection systems suffer during periods of poor visibility where other technologies may offer an alternative. Radar is one such technology. It too has seen significant development in recent years and according to Navtech Radar, the technology can often fulfil detection and moni
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t