Skip to main content

An analysis of real-world crashes involving self-driving vehicles

A study by the University of Michigan performed a preliminary analysis of the cumulative on-road safety record of self-driving vehicles for three of the ten companies that are currently approved for such vehicle testing in California (Google, Delphi, and Audi). The analysis compared the safety record of these vehicles with the safety record of all conventional vehicles in the US for 2013 (adjusted for underreporting of crashes that do not involve a fatality).
October 30, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
A study by the University of Michigan performed a preliminary analysis of the cumulative on-road safety record of self-driving vehicles for three of the ten companies that are currently approved for such vehicle testing in California (1691 Google, 7207 Delphi, and 2125 Audi).

The analysis compared the safety record of these vehicles with the safety record of all conventional vehicles in the US for 2013 (adjusted for underreporting of crashes that do not involve a fatality).

Taking into account the fact that the distance accumulated by self-driving vehicles is still relatively low compared with conventional vehicles and that the vehicles were driven only in limited conditions, the study came up with some interesting results.

These, including the facts that self-driving vehicles may have a higher crash rate per million miles travelled than conventional vehicles, and self-driving vehicles were not at fault in any crashes they were involved in, are available in the report abstract on the university’s website. (link %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkExternal http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2015-34_Abstract_English.pdf Visit Umich false http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2015-34_Abstract_English.pdf false false%>).

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Flir Certified System Engineer training
    April 20, 2016
    Flir’s new Certified System Engineer two-day course provides certified training on automatic incident detection and data collection solutions using Flir intelligent transportation systems visual and thermal detection systems. The interactive and hands-on training takes place in Ghent, Belgium on 14 and 15 June; topics covered include: The architecture and principles of thermal and visual detection; Camera selection and position; Safety and security in tunnels, on highways and bridges; Traffic data collec
  • Snoline’s improved crash cushion offers greater safety
    March 25, 2014
    Italian firm Snoline says that its Tau Tube redirective crash cushion offers low-cost crash protection. Paula Ferraris, communications & marketing manager for the firm said: “It is like the previous Tau but with a new impact absorbing system. It can stop a car travelling at 110km/h in less than 7m.” The system is said to be simple to install and is designed for long life, with a galvanised steel structure and meets the European EN1317-3 safety criteria. The impact absorbing beams are made from aluminium and
  • European Conference on ICT for transport logistics 2015
    September 7, 2015
    The 8th European Conference on ICT for Transport Logistics (ECITL) will be held in Bordeaux from 5 to 7 October 2015 with the theme of Intelligent logistics solutions – a catalyst for digital economy. The ECITL is co-organised by Ertico-ITS Europe under the auspices of the CIP Pilot CO-GISTICS. The conference will look at in-depth technologies as intelligent transport systems (ITS), vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), etc., which are not only essential for the introduction of e
  • US DOT announces vehicle-to-infrastructure guidance
    January 20, 2017
    The US Department of Transportation (US DOT) has announced new Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) guidance (link http://www.its.dot.gov/v2i.) that aims to improve safety and mobility by accelerating the deployment of V2I communication systems. The guidance complements the Department's efforts to reduce crashes by advancing vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technology announced in a proposed rule in December. V2I communication is an important component of a connecte