Skip to main content

ACRS calls for Australian Government to commit to eliminating road trauma

The Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) has released its 2017 ACRS Submission to Federal Parliamentarians - The way forward to reduce road trauma, outlining what it says is Australia’s stalled progress against National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020 targets for death and injury reduction. According to ACRS, road trauma is one of the highest ranking public health issues Australia faces , with 1,300 deaths and 37,000 injuries per year, and rising. The causes and consequences of road trauma contin
March 28, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) has released its 2017 ACRS Submission to Federal Parliamentarians - The way forward to reduce road trauma, outlining what it says is Australia’s stalled progress against National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020 targets for death and injury reduction.

According to ACRS, road trauma is one of the highest ranking public health issues Australia faces , with 1,300 deaths and 37,000 injuries per year, and rising.

The causes and consequences of road trauma continue to have a serious impact on Australia’s productivity, estimated by the federal government to cost the economy US$20.5 billion (AU$27billion) per year in 2011 (US$24.3 billion (AU$32billion today) and equivalent to 18 per cent of health expenditure.

ACRS says road trauma in rural and regional Australia is over-represented in the statistics, in 2015 accounting for around 65 per cent of all trauma. Over the 2003 to 2015 period, 2081 (65 per cent) worker fatalities involved vehicles. Of these, almost half (49 per cent) occurred on a public road. Transport crash injury cases increased from 12 per cent to 13 per cent of all injury hospitalised cases during the periods 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.

While the majority of road safety improvements are implemented and seen as the responsibility of State, Territory and Local Governments, the impact of road trauma is evident in programs across all Federal portfolios, in business, and of course across the community.

The Submission presents comprehensive recommendations on the way forward to reduce road trauma and calls on the Federal Government to  commit to the ultimate goal of eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the road.

It also calls for a full inquiry into the impact of road trauma on Australia’s productivity, and the national investment and policy decisions required to achieve the nation’s policy goals of a safe road transport system.

ACRS is also calling for a full policy review on leveraging greater safety results from the current investment in road transport; and for all new vehicles to be equipped with world best practice safety technology and meet world best practice crash-worthiness.

It also says a six-monthly forum on road safety should be established, to review progress in road safety at a national level, and discuss key initiatives for significantly improving results.

Related Content

  • GHSA wants more action on distracted driving 
    May 5, 2021
    Some US state laws have not kept pace with tech, says lobby group StopDistractions.org
  • EU regions urge adequate funding for sustainable transport
    April 21, 2015
    The European Committee of the Regions (CoR) is concerned by the lack of investment by the EU in the transport sector. According to regions and cities, very little progress has been made also in integrating the European transport market in the last four years. These concerns were debated by CoR members at the 16 April plenary session, which saw the adoption of the opinion on the implementation of the 2011 European Commission White Paper on Transport, aiming to create a single European transport area. The
  • Shailen Bhatt: 'We want to save lives with connectivity by accelerating V2X deployment'
    December 11, 2023
    US government money is available for Vehicle to Everything roll-outs. FHWA's Shailen Bhatt talks to Adam Hill about changing the narrative on road safety - and the importance of deploying technology at scale
  • USDoT looks at the costs and potential benefits of connected vehicles
    October 26, 2017
    David Crawford looks at latest lessons learned from the trials of connected vehicles in the US. The progress of connected vehicle (CV) technologies takes centre stage among the hot topics highlighted in the September 2017 edition – the first since 2014 – of the ‘ITS Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned’ survey from the US ITS Joint Program Office (JPO). The organisation is an arm of the US Department of Transportation (USDoT).