Skip to main content

ACRS calls for Australian Government to commit to eliminating road trauma

The Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) has released its 2017 ACRS Submission to Federal Parliamentarians - The way forward to reduce road trauma, outlining what it says is Australia’s stalled progress against National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020 targets for death and injury reduction. According to ACRS, road trauma is one of the highest ranking public health issues Australia faces , with 1,300 deaths and 37,000 injuries per year, and rising. The causes and consequences of road trauma contin
March 28, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) has released its 2017 ACRS Submission to Federal Parliamentarians - The way forward to reduce road trauma, outlining what it says is Australia’s stalled progress against National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020 targets for death and injury reduction.

According to ACRS, road trauma is one of the highest ranking public health issues Australia faces , with 1,300 deaths and 37,000 injuries per year, and rising.

The causes and consequences of road trauma continue to have a serious impact on Australia’s productivity, estimated by the federal government to cost the economy US$20.5 billion (AU$27billion) per year in 2011 (US$24.3 billion (AU$32billion today) and equivalent to 18 per cent of health expenditure.

ACRS says road trauma in rural and regional Australia is over-represented in the statistics, in 2015 accounting for around 65 per cent of all trauma. Over the 2003 to 2015 period, 2081 (65 per cent) worker fatalities involved vehicles. Of these, almost half (49 per cent) occurred on a public road. Transport crash injury cases increased from 12 per cent to 13 per cent of all injury hospitalised cases during the periods 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.

While the majority of road safety improvements are implemented and seen as the responsibility of State, Territory and Local Governments, the impact of road trauma is evident in programs across all Federal portfolios, in business, and of course across the community.

The Submission presents comprehensive recommendations on the way forward to reduce road trauma and calls on the Federal Government to  commit to the ultimate goal of eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the road.

It also calls for a full inquiry into the impact of road trauma on Australia’s productivity, and the national investment and policy decisions required to achieve the nation’s policy goals of a safe road transport system.

ACRS is also calling for a full policy review on leveraging greater safety results from the current investment in road transport; and for all new vehicles to be equipped with world best practice safety technology and meet world best practice crash-worthiness.

It also says a six-monthly forum on road safety should be established, to review progress in road safety at a national level, and discuss key initiatives for significantly improving results.

Related Content

  • Missouri’s Road to Tomorrow provides ITS answers
    December 22, 2015
    Andrew Bardin Williams looks at Missouri’s plans to become America’s ITS testbed The state of Missouri launched its Road to Tomorrow initiative earlier this summer at the ITS America Annual Meeting and Expo in Pittsburgh, rolling out the welcome mat for transportation officials to try out new, innovative ITS technologies in the field.
  • Dutch road safety ‘getting worse’ says expert
    October 7, 2019
    Roads in the Netherlands have become more dangerous over the last decade, according to one of the country’s leading road safety experts.
  • Covid-19 risks creating US ‘transit death spiral’
    July 24, 2020
    Ridership is way down and the government is urged to find more money to help
  • EU urged to fast-track revised cross-border enforcement law
    July 21, 2014
    TISPOL and its road safety partners across Europe are urging the EU to fast-track the adoption of a modified law on cross-border enforcement of traffic offences such as speeding. The modified rules, published by the European Commission, come in response to a European Court of Justice ruling in May that said the existing law, which came into force in November last year, had been adopted on an incorrect legal basis. The ECJ has said the current rules could remain in effect until May 2015 while new legisla