Skip to main content

$4 per gallon gas won’t alter driving behaviour, claims national study

As America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).
May 15, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSAs America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).

A review of gas prices and their weekly climb suggest that in the next few weeks America will reach $4 per gallon average. While gas prices vary regionally, experts predict that they will average $4 per gallon or higher throughout the summer of 2012. Recent predictions from the 5541 US Energy Information Administration suggest prices will average just over $4 per gallon by May and stay there.

The prevailing thought among transit agencies and transportation planners is that the $4 mark represents a major psychological threshold. Once breached, commuters will shift en mass from SOV travel to more efficient and less costly rideshare and telework options.

The Mobility Collaborative study suggests a different reality. According to the research, conducted by 5540 BIGinsight, only 8.7 per cent of respondents reported they would increase carpooling and 6.6 per cent say they would take public transit more. Consumers do not always act the way they report, but as the authors point out, the $4 per gallon price point has been reached twice previously. Both times interest in commute alternatives increased, but few actually changed behaviour. A small portion of individuals, often those with lower incomes who couldn't afford the additional costs, changed their behaviour, but not the masses as previously predicted.

This ‘non-event’ means America will continue as an automobile-dependent society. The study suggests two reasons why: First, automobiles are getting better gas mileage, reducing pressure caused by rising gas prices. Second, gas prices rise relatively slowly over time, so people learn to adjust their budgets to absorb the additional cost. These factors undermine America's shift to a more sustainable transportation system, like those found in a few American urban environments such as Arlington County, Virginia.

John Martin, a member of the Collaborative said "bigger things need to change in order for people to change their behaviour: Governments, vehicle manufacturers, employers and others need to provide travel options so consumers can accomplish the tasks of daily life while driving fewer miles."

The Mobility Collaborative's study "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride and the Rising Price of Gas," is available at sirtransportation.com.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Trial results change perceptions of EVs
    November 26, 2012
    The results of two one-year electric vehicle (EV) trials carried out in the Netherlands and Sweden were presented at the European Electric Vehicle Congress (EEVC) 2012. All aspects of EVs were taken into account during these trials; results show that after an EV is integrated in people’s daily use, most preconceptions are proved wrong.
  • Getting more for less from traffic data
    August 15, 2012
    Collection of traffic and transit data has grown significantly, combining with advances in connectivity and computational modelling to good effect. Desire to do more with less – to make budgets go further – has helped create a boom in the collection and study of traffic and transport data. Studies are becoming longer, greater in number and further in-depth as more intelligence is sought, plus, transportation agencies are looking to make processes of data collection less costly, or more efficient.
  • Women driving innovation in mobility
    March 9, 2022
    Transportation was built through the lens of men: that ecosystem needs to change
  • Speed cameras make safety savings?
    April 18, 2012
    The use of speed cameras in urban areas is said to make major savings overall, according to a new study. A two year cost-benefit analysis published online in Injury Prevention shows that the deployment of speed cameras in urban areas saves vast amounts of money as well as lives.