Skip to main content

VW faces first legal test case over emissions in Germany

German consumer rights champion myRight filed the first legal test case against Volkswagen (VW) in Germany on Tuesday, raising pressure on the carmaker to compensate customers in Europe over the emissions scandal, according to Reuters. VW has pledged billions to compensate US owners of its diesel-powered cars, but has so far rejected any compensation for the 8.5 million affected vehicles in Europe where different legal rules weaken the chances of affected customers winning a pay-out. Instead, VW is in
January 6, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
German consumer rights champion myRight filed the first legal test case against 994 Volkswagen (VW) in Germany on Tuesday, raising pressure on the carmaker to compensate customers in Europe over the emissions scandal, according to Reuters.

VW has pledged billions to compensate US owners of its diesel-powered cars, but has so far rejected any compensation for the 8.5 million affected vehicles in Europe where different legal rules weaken the chances of affected customers winning a pay-out.

Instead, VW is in the process of removing the illicit software that cheated emissions tests and insists the technical fixes will inflict no loss of value on car owners in Europe. It hopes to have completed repairs to all affected vehicles by the end of the year.

MyRight, which has gathered more than 100,000 VW owners through its web site, has accused VW of breaching European Union law by selling cars with software that was banned under EU rules, according to the 93-page legal document seen by Reuters.

Rather than seeking compensation for a decline in value, the lawsuit aims to force VW to repurchase the vehicles at the original price, myRight founder Jan-Eike Andresen said.

MyRight has retainede US law firm Hausfeld to pursue the claims. Hausfeld represents aggrieved VW owners and shareholders on both sides of the Atlantic.

The purpose of the proceedings by myRight is to act as a model - resolving generic or common issues for other related cases. However, unlike in a US class action, it does not have the legal effect of resolving all individual claims.

Volkswagen has said the software fitted into the engine at the centre of the scandal, codenamed EA 189 does not violate European law and declined comment on the myRight suit. "We have taken note that myRight has announced the submission of diesel lawsuits for 3 January. The lawsuits have not yet been made available to us, which is why we cannot comment on the contents at the moment," the carmaker said.

Related Content

  • Is Europe's Galileo project value for money?
    February 2, 2012
    Philippe Hamet discusses the progress of the European Union's Galileo Global Navigation Satellite System Project
  • EU sets out to increase surveillance of vehicle type approval
    January 28, 2016
    In the wake of the VW emissions scandal in late 2015, the European Commission has published its proposed revision of vehicle type approval legislation. In a clear effort towards reform, the Commission calls for market surveillance for vehicles after their release. The proposal increases the oversight of type approval authorities and introduces regular checks from independent market surveillance authorities.
  • More congestion pricing on menu for French cities
    October 22, 2018
    French cities could make congestion pricing a key means of managing urban traffic flow, if a new draft law comes into being. Transport minister Elisabeth Borne has announced that legislation will be put before parliament in November, according to a Reuters report. This would allow cities to introduce tolls – similar to the London congestion charge. “Urban tolls will be part of the new mobility law, which will provide tools for local authorities to respond to mobility challenges on their territory,” Borne
  • In-vehicle systems as enforcement enablers?
    January 30, 2012
    From an enforcement perspective at least, Toyota's recent recalls over problems with accelerator pedal assemblies had a positive outcome in that for the first time a major motor manufacturer outside of the US acknowledged publicly what many have known or suspected for quite a while: that the capability exists within certain car companies to extract data from a vehicle onboard unit which can be used to help ascertain, if not prove outright, just what was happening in the vital seconds up to an accident or cr