Skip to main content

TomTom: Congestion costs on UK businesses increase by £148m

UK Congestion is costing businesses £915m ($1,229m) a year in lost productivity, according to the latest figures revealed by TomTom’s (TT’s) Traffic Index. Findings showed this figure is an increase of £148m ($198m) from last year’s £767m ($1,030m).
December 14, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
UK Congestion is costing businesses £915m ($1,229m) a year in lost productivity, according to the latest figures revealed by 1692 TomTom’s (TT’s) Traffic Index. Findings showed this figure is an increase of £148m ($198m) from last year’s £767m ($1,030m).


In London, £264m ($354m) is lost each year, followed by Manchester (£169,256,880) ($227,486,467) and the Birmingham area, including Wolverhampton (£144,184,320) ($193,773,012).

According to the Index’s ranking of the most congested cities, London and Edinburgh both have an average congestion of 40%; with 19 and 21 working days lost per vehicle per year. In addition, Manchester has an average congestion of 38% with 21 working days lost per vehicle per year.

Traffic across the UK’s 25 most congested cities and towns increase the time each vehicle spends on the road by an average of 129 hours a year, which equates to an average commercial vehicle driver wasting more than 16 working days stuck in traffic.

Findings also revealed that traffic has been getting continuously worse since 2010, with an average journey now taking 30% longer than it would in free-flowing conditions.  

Beverley Wise, director UK & Ireland for TT Telematics, said: “Traffic remains a serious issue for business and the resulting delays have potential implications for productivity, customer service standards and even employee wellbeing. Unfortunately, congestion levels continue to rise and the UK economy is paying the price for this at a time when the landscape is already challenging enough, with the growth rate now expected to be just 1.5% this year.

“But, although solutions to the wider traffic problem are incredibly complex, businesses can take action now to mitigate its effect by using data to develop smarter working schedules and shift patterns that help employees avoid driving at peak times. Technology such as telematics can help in the move towards a more dynamic model of routing and scheduling that uses data on traffic and journey times to develop plans that minimise time on the road and can be quickly adapted in reaction to delays or changing circumstances.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Lorries hitting rail bridges peak in October causing hours of delays and cancellations, Network Rail
    October 26, 2017
    Hundreds of thousands of rail passengers will suffer hours of delays and cancellations this month as figures for oversized lorries hitting low bridges (bridge-strikes) peaked in October/ November to around ten reported incidents every day, according to a new campaign by Network Rail. In addition, there are 2,000 bridge strikes every year costing the taxpayer some £23 million ($30 million) in damages and delays.
  • Cubic’s holistic view of traffic management
    May 25, 2022
    How can cities and transit agencies ease congested roadways? Andy Taylor of Cubic Transportation Systems suggests it would help to take a more holistic view of the problem
  • TomTom On-Street Parking service available in 100 European Cities
    February 8, 2018
    Amsterdam-based TomTom’s (TOM2’s) On-Street Parking service is now available in 100 European cities. The solution is designed with the intention of providing drivers with the probability of finding a parking space on the street, including locations where parking is free, as well as the average search-time. It is available for OEM and Enterprise clients.
  • High capacity and low diesel prices further decrease transport price index
    May 25, 2016
    The twenty-seventh edition of the Transport Market Monitor (TMM) by Transporeon and Capgemini Consulting reveals that transport prices decreased by 6.8 per cent in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the fourth quarter of 2015; when compared to the first quarter of 2015, the price index decreased by 3.2 per cent. In the first quarter of 2016, the capacity index increased to 110.7 (25.0 per cent), the highest value since the first quarter of 2014 (index 114.4). The diesel index dropped to the lowes