Reducing high levels of particles in tunnels

A new study from Sweden’s National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) which aims to improve understanding of the differences between inhalable particles in highway versus railway environments has indicated that older types of trains produce more particulate emissions in railroad tunnels than do newer ones. Dust binding, improved paving and reduced studded tyre use could reduce coarse particle levels in road tunnels.
March 1, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

A new study from Sweden’s National Road and Transport Research Institute (5230 VTI) which aims to improve understanding of the differences between inhalable particles in highway versus railway environments has indicated that older types of trains produce more particulate emissions in railroad tunnels than do newer ones. Dust binding, improved paving and reduced studded tyre use could reduce coarse particle levels in road tunnels.

The tests were carried out in Sweden at Arlanda Central station beneath Arlanda Airport and in the Söderleden road tunnel in central Stockholm. The results indicate that the environment of the studied railroad tunnel is characterised by peaks in coarse particle concentration. Some trains can be tied to emissions of ultrafine particles which consist mainly of iron, with lesser amounts of copper, zinc and other metals.

The main focus of measures to remedy high particle counts in railway tunnels has so far been on preventing exposure by separating trains from platforms or using ventilation to remove polluted air, but few studies have examined the means available to prevent the emissions themselves.

According to VTI researcher Mats Gustafsson, the study demonstrates that it is possible to reduce particulate emissions by identifying and improving train types as well as individual trains and their characteristics.

Road tunnels are characterised by high levels of ultrafine particles and high levels of coarse particles when conditions are dry. Because the traffic in such tunnels is more intense than in railroad tunnels, the particle levels are more consistently high during rush hours.

“The options available to combat coarse particles in road tunnels comprise reduced studded tyre use, better paving, and efficient dust binding and cleaning”, said Gustafsson.

The ultrafine particles that occur in high concentrations derive from vehicle exhaust and can be addressed by reducing traffic volumes, improving exhaust treatment, and lowering the proportion of heavy traffic, he says.

Air Quality & Weather Systems

Related Content

  • May 26, 2020
    Road markings can be 'microplastics risk' - new report
    Sweden’s VTI and Chalmers University of Technology have catalogued the available literature
    Read More
  • May 17, 2012
    Safety issue for Swedish tunnel
    Safety concerns have been raised over air pollution levels in Stockholm's 18km tunnel bypass. Data from the Swedish Transport Agency (Trafikverket) suggests that pollution in the Stockholm Bypass project (Förbifart Stockholm) could result in 20-30 fatalities/year due to the increased risk of triggering serious breathing disorders. The data suggests that high levels of dangerous particulate matter could pose a serious risk to users of the tunnel at peak periods. The new road will be paved with concrete rathe
    Read More
  • April 7, 2014
    Pollution has more than one solution
    Professor Alexander Baklanov of the World Meteorological Organization talks to Colin Sowman about the difficulties of reducing urban pollution. The inhabitants of Beijing have recently been suffering pollution levels 20 times the World Health Organisation’s recommended limit while the European Union is revitalising its efforts to implement and enforce air quality standards. Almost inevitably much of the clean-up efforts are likely to focus on traffic planners and engineers.
    Read More
  • June 29, 2016
    Are truck bans the wrong move in the battle for air quality
    Low emission zones and heavy goods vehicles’ access to city centres may at first glance appear attractive but how effective are such controls? Jon Masters reviews emerging trends across Europe. Around 1,700 European cities have implemented low emission zones (LEZs) and in addition some have restricted city centre access for heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). Even those that restrict HGV access, such as Paris and Rome, allow exemptions at certain times and for particular classes of vehicle. But with what effect?
    Read More

Highlighted Content