Skip to main content

Mindset change needed for Net Zero

Mobility Camp 'Unconference' comes up with range of ideas on sustainability
By Adam Hill October 14, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
The voluntary organising team came from organisations across the mobility sector

Mobility Camp's fifth annual Unconference, a volunteer-run event, brought together 80 transport planners, modellers, engineers, technologists, academics and students to debate and suggest solutions to one of the biggest ongoing challenges for the sector: ‘Backing Sustainable Transport’.

Founder James Gleave said: "Transport remains the UK’s largest emitting sector for greenhouse gases, representing 27% of the UK’s annual carbon emissions. We need to change the mindset and the approach to both public and private transport to hit the country’s Net Zero priority."

Attendees at the event in Bristol, UK, split into groups to discuss various themes.

For instance, one focused on the problem of how siloed funding focuses the majority of public spend on road building rather than active travel.

It came up with an idea to combine all road-based activity under one body (including policing related to road accidents and Active Travel England). Funding would therefore become conditional based on how well any road-based scheme incorporates active travel.

Another group looked at the problem of transport professionals having their carefully thought-out plans flatly rejected.

The conversation revealed insights and exposed some gaps, particularly in budget and skills for effective engagement, sparking some ideas and suggestions for research into the area.

At an unconference, only the theme and rooms are set up by the organisers, with sessions suggested and decided upon by attendees on the day, so they shape the event.

Attendees came up with a range of proposals supported by their own personal commitments, including making sustainable travel more aspirational, improving the narrative that brings the public along the journey rather than preached too, a call to reconsider advertising of SUVs and a comprehensive review of how people are being educated with a need to think differently about transport and its future prospects. 

The voluntary organising team came from organisations across the sector including TfGM, TRL Software, West Yorkshire Combined Authority, Systra, Mott MacDonald, Esoterix, Institute for Transport Studies, PJA, Oyster Partnership and WSP.

Click here for more information.
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    February 1, 2012
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is
  • Qualcomm: How Connected Driving Will Reduce Emissions in the EU
    September 14, 2023
    In an era marked by climate change and an urgent need for greener mobility solutions, the advent of connected driving has emerged as a promising frontier in the realm of transportation.
  • Use of AI, unlocking innovation - and new political leaders: our experts pick out 2025's key drivers
    December 30, 2024
    Is predicting the future doomed to failure? Not when ITS International's experts are on the case...
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London