Skip to main content

London faces ULEZ revolt by councils

Mayor says ULEZ expansion is needed to address climate and public health goals
By Adam Hill January 20, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
ULEZ scheme has been in place in London for almost four years and is being expanded in August (© AlenaKravchenko | Dreamstime.com)

Several councils in London are digging in their heels over the proposed expansion of the UK capital's ultra low emissions zone (ULEZ).

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan plans to expand the ULEZ to all the city's boroughs from 29 August this year, which means drivers of older or more polluting vehicles will have to pay £12.50 a day in the zone.

But he is facing pushback and a potential legal battle, according to London's Evening Standard, which says an extra 2,750 ANPR enforcement cameras would be needed.

Sutton Council, in the south of London, has refused to enter into a section 8 agreement under the Highways Act 1980, which would enable Transport for London to implement the infrastructure changes - including camera installation - required. 

Council leader Ruth Dombey said she would continue to seek to delay the roll-out of the scheme - even though the mayor says the ULEZ expansion is needed to address the 4,000 Londoners he says die prematurely each year due to air pollution.

But Dombey counters: “We all understand the importance of clean air and recognise the impact pollution has on the lives of people living in our city."

"But we also have to recognise the pressures our residents are facing with the soaring cost of living. Over 70% of residents in Sutton have ULEZ-compliant vehicles, that means nearly 30% do not and in a matter of months the mayor is expecting our residents to stump up the cash to change their car or use public transport that doesn’t exist."

Dombey insists that ULEZ expansion "must be accompanied by significant investment in public transport, a fair and comprehensive scrappage scheme and an extension of the planned implementation date". 

Bromley, Bexley, Harrow and Hillingdon councils are to “examine the legal basis” of the plan, the Standard reports.

The mayor's office says the ULEZ changes are aimed at tackling "the triple challenges of toxic air pollution, the climate emergency and traffic congestion".  

It says London has made "significant progress over the last six years in improving air quality".

But toxic air caused by traffic causes the greatest number of deaths in London’s outer boroughs, "which the ULEZ doesn’t currently cover".

"There has also been a slower rate of improvement in air quality in outer London than in central and inner London," it concludes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Give offending drivers credit for good behaviour
    July 27, 2012
    Andrew Rooke and Dave Marples of Technolution B.V. take a look at what can be done to address a long-standing problem: the all-or-nothing approach of automated enforcement. To start, a brief history of speeding: on 14 November 1896, the first Veteran Car Run was staged in England from London to Brighton. It was organised to celebrate new British legislation to raise the maximum speed of vehicles from four to 14mph while also removing the need for a person waving a red flag to walk in front of the car and wa
  • MaaS Market London: transport revolution
    June 11, 2019
    ITS International’s third MaaS Market conference in London provoked lively discussions about micromobility, AVs, the stupidity of car drivers - and Star Trek. Adam Hill was taking notes…
  • What's next for traffic management and data collection?
    January 26, 2012
    As the technologies and stakeholders in traffic management evolve, what can we expect to see happening in the coming years? For many, the conversation of the moment is just how, and how far, the newer technologies and services provided principally by the private sector should be allowed to intrude into the realms of traffic management.
  • Can drivers be responsible for AV offences?
    January 28, 2022
    Report in UK from two Law Commissions recommends a new Automated Vehicles Act