Skip to main content

London faces ULEZ revolt by councils

Mayor says ULEZ expansion is needed to address climate and public health goals
By Adam Hill January 20, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
ULEZ scheme has been in place in London for almost four years and is being expanded in August (© AlenaKravchenko | Dreamstime.com)

Several councils in London are digging in their heels over the proposed expansion of the UK capital's ultra low emissions zone (ULEZ).

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan plans to expand the ULEZ to all the city's boroughs from 29 August this year, which means drivers of older or more polluting vehicles will have to pay £12.50 a day in the zone.

But he is facing pushback and a potential legal battle, according to London's Evening Standard, which says an extra 2,750 ANPR enforcement cameras would be needed.

Sutton Council, in the south of London, has refused to enter into a section 8 agreement under the Highways Act 1980, which would enable Transport for London to implement the infrastructure changes - including camera installation - required. 

Council leader Ruth Dombey said she would continue to seek to delay the roll-out of the scheme - even though the mayor says the ULEZ expansion is needed to address the 4,000 Londoners he says die prematurely each year due to air pollution.

But Dombey counters: “We all understand the importance of clean air and recognise the impact pollution has on the lives of people living in our city."

"But we also have to recognise the pressures our residents are facing with the soaring cost of living. Over 70% of residents in Sutton have ULEZ-compliant vehicles, that means nearly 30% do not and in a matter of months the mayor is expecting our residents to stump up the cash to change their car or use public transport that doesn’t exist."

Dombey insists that ULEZ expansion "must be accompanied by significant investment in public transport, a fair and comprehensive scrappage scheme and an extension of the planned implementation date". 

Bromley, Bexley, Harrow and Hillingdon councils are to “examine the legal basis” of the plan, the Standard reports.

The mayor's office says the ULEZ changes are aimed at tackling "the triple challenges of toxic air pollution, the climate emergency and traffic congestion".  

It says London has made "significant progress over the last six years in improving air quality".

But toxic air caused by traffic causes the greatest number of deaths in London’s outer boroughs, "which the ULEZ doesn’t currently cover".

"There has also been a slower rate of improvement in air quality in outer London than in central and inner London," it concludes.

Related Content

  • Connected vehicles take modern spin on an old classic
    February 13, 2024
    How do we transition the millions of vehicles on the world’s road to a connected and - one day - automated future? Andy Graham of White Willow Consulting highlights an intriguing pilot which sought to make some of the UK’s oldest vehicles connected – using just a phone
  • UK Government Air Quality Plan – call for funding for FCEVs
    July 27, 2017
    Following the release of the UK Government’s final Air Quality Plan, in which it announced that it will ban all petrol and diesel vehicles (including hybrids) from 2040, ITM Power says this represents an historic first step towards cleaner and greener transport in the UK. However, it is calling on the UK Government to provide equivalent financial support for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) infrastructure as it has already provided for plug-in battery electric vehicle (BEV) infrastructure. The company, wh
  • E-scooter fires spark TfL ban 
    December 16, 2021
    Defective lithium-ion batteries to blame; £1,000 fines for people who don't comply
  • Authorities play the parking ticket
    April 10, 2014
    Having long been a cause of contention with their constituents, local authorities are now using parking provision to entice shoppers and reduce congestion. To say that parking, and particularly parking enforcement, is a contentious and emotive issue is something of an understatement. Across the globe the discontentment with parking facilities, charges and enforcement is a major cause of friction between local authorities and the residents, businesses and drivers in the area. Recently there was outrage in