Skip to main content

Leeds abandons plans for CAZ

UK city says that the initiative has already done its job in reducing pollution
By Adam Hill October 19, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Leeds: much, much cleaner than before (© Philip Openshaw | Dreamstime.com)

The UK city of Leeds’ planned clean air zone (CAZ) is no longer required – because businesses have already switched to cleaner vehicles.

A review by Leeds City Council and UK central government found this means air pollution in Leeds on key routes is “below legal limits and is not likely to exceed them again - even if traffic were to return to ‘normal’ levels or slightly higher”.

Another UK city, Birmingham, recently announced its own central CAZ will be introduced in 2021.

But Leeds says there is now no need in its case: more than 90% of buses and 80% of heavy goods vehicles driven in the city now use cleaner Euro VI engines – so would not be charged, even if there were a CAZ. 

Nearly half the city’s licensed taxi and private hire cars are also now hybrid or electric. 

“We didn’t expect it this early,” a council spokesman admitted to ITS International. 

“There has been a massive shift in the number of vehicles that are compliant. But CAZs were always designed to be temporary measures – the aim is to accelerate improvement as quickly as possible.”

The council is asking the UK government to be allowed to keep £6.9 million of CAZ funding to continue offering grants to local firms to switch to cleaner vehicles, and will be able to keep and repurpose the ANPR cameras which were installed to monitor and enforce the zone.

"In the unlikely event that air quality declined for any reason, the council retains this infrastructure and could seek support from central government to introduce a CAZ," it said.

The council is now considering the voluntary introduction of stricter air quality guidelines along the lines of World Health Organisation recommendations.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Authorities play the parking ticket
    April 10, 2014
    Having long been a cause of contention with their constituents, local authorities are now using parking provision to entice shoppers and reduce congestion. To say that parking, and particularly parking enforcement, is a contentious and emotive issue is something of an understatement. Across the globe the discontentment with parking facilities, charges and enforcement is a major cause of friction between local authorities and the residents, businesses and drivers in the area. Recently there was outrage in
  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe
  • EVs: Time for a rethink
    December 14, 2021
    Given a growing body of evidence that EVs are not the clean, green machines they are made out to be, Andrew Bunn suggests they can only be part of the puzzle – not the answer to environmental problems
  • Opinion: Have we missed our moment to reinvent mass transport?
    September 16, 2020
    We need to focus on providing better mass transportation services during the COVID-19 pandemic - and work out how to help travellers to rapidly regain confidence in using them as lockdowns end