Skip to main content

Leeds abandons plans for CAZ

UK city says that the initiative has already done its job in reducing pollution
By Adam Hill October 19, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Leeds: much, much cleaner than before (© Philip Openshaw | Dreamstime.com)

The UK city of Leeds’ planned clean air zone (CAZ) is no longer required – because businesses have already switched to cleaner vehicles.

A review by Leeds City Council and UK central government found this means air pollution in Leeds on key routes is “below legal limits and is not likely to exceed them again - even if traffic were to return to ‘normal’ levels or slightly higher”.

Another UK city, Birmingham, recently announced its own central CAZ will be introduced in 2021.

But Leeds says there is now no need in its case: more than 90% of buses and 80% of heavy goods vehicles driven in the city now use cleaner Euro VI engines – so would not be charged, even if there were a CAZ. 

Nearly half the city’s licensed taxi and private hire cars are also now hybrid or electric. 

“We didn’t expect it this early,” a council spokesman admitted to ITS International. 

“There has been a massive shift in the number of vehicles that are compliant. But CAZs were always designed to be temporary measures – the aim is to accelerate improvement as quickly as possible.”

The council is asking the UK government to be allowed to keep £6.9 million of CAZ funding to continue offering grants to local firms to switch to cleaner vehicles, and will be able to keep and repurpose the ANPR cameras which were installed to monitor and enforce the zone.

"In the unlikely event that air quality declined for any reason, the council retains this infrastructure and could seek support from central government to introduce a CAZ," it said.

The council is now considering the voluntary introduction of stricter air quality guidelines along the lines of World Health Organisation recommendations.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • 15-minute city inventor seeks to clarify 'confusion' over concept
    March 1, 2024
    Focus should be more on the idea of 'sustainable proximities', Carlos Moreno says
  • Section speed enforcements gains global converts
    October 26, 2017
    As the benefits of section speed enforcement are becoming clearer, the technology is gaining converts worldwide. Colin Sowman reports. America’s National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is calling for urgent action from both road authorities and the federal government to combat speeding which has been identified as one of the most common factors in motor vehicle crashes in the United States. This new call follows the publication of a safety study which found that between 2005 through 2014, 31% of all
  • MoceanLab discovers new Covid car-share use
    October 20, 2020
    The coronavirus pandemic has prompted some radical re-thinking of mobility services. Ben Spencer hears how MoceanLab car-share vehicles are delivering care to LA's homeless