Skip to main content

High cost of French air pollution, report cites transportation

A report entitled Air pollution: the cost of inaction, published in July by the French Senate Committee of Enquiry estimates the annual cost of air pollution in France at €101.3 billion ($110 trillion), according to EurActiv France. The committee has described air pp0llution as an ‘economic aberration’ and has proposed measured including raising the tax on diesel and taxing emissions of the worst polluting substances. While overall air pollution has fallen in recent years, "the nature of the pollution
August 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
A report entitled Air pollution: the cost of inaction, published in July by the French Senate Committee of Enquiry estimates the annual cost of air pollution in France at €101.3 billion ($110 trillion), according to EurActiv France.

The committee has described air pp0llution as an ‘economic aberration’ and has proposed measured including raising the tax on diesel and taxing emissions of the worst polluting substances.

While overall air pollution has fallen in recent years, "the nature of the pollution has changed". Rather than localised industrial pollution, today's problem is more diffuse, caused by transport, heating and agriculture, the report said.

Particle pollution is responsible for 42,000 premature deaths each year in France alone, according to the 1819 World Health Organisation (WHO).

The French transport sector alone produces 59 per cent of the country's nitrogen oxide and up to 19 per cent of its fine particle emissions.

In order to bring these under control, the senators called for ‘truly ecological taxation’. This approach would see the establishment of taxes on emissions of nitrogen, nitrogen oxide and fine particles, as well as improvements to existing emissions standards.

The 1690 European Commission is currently pursuing an infringement procedure against France for ignoring the fine particle limits in place in certain areas.

The report, adopted unanimously by the French Senate, recommends putting an end to the ‘persistent ambiguity of the public authorities’ by aligning the tax on diesel and petrol for transport by 2020 and axing the VAT reduction for fuel and electricity used by hybrid and electric vehicles.

The committee also recommended opening an inquiry into the specific causes of the high death rate among farmers and how best to limit emissions from the agriculture sector, as well as developing a labelling system for products that emit volatile pollutants.

According to the Senate committee, efforts to cut air pollution to date have saved France around US$12 trillion.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Can GNSS solve the tolling world’s woes?
    December 5, 2013
    Kapsch’s Arno Klamminger and Wolfgang Fleischer consider the need for an agnostic approach to technology for charging and tolling. Periodically, given the march of technology, it is worth pausing and taking stock of where we have got to and where we go next. Such reflections are necessary if we are to take full advantage of what we have at our disposal and, potentially, avoid decisions which push us down technological culs de sac. A look at the use of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based technol
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • Gearing up for the global electric vehicle revolution
    May 3, 2019
    As transport, communications and energy networks become inextricably linked, policy makers are recognising the implications for our built environment – and the growing electric vehicle market will have a major impact on the world’s infrastructure, says Rolton Group’s Chris Evans
  • Brake, IAM concerned at government figures on UK drink-drive habit
    August 7, 2015
    Brake, the road safety charity, and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM), have responded to the latest government figures which they say show Britain is still failing to adequately tackle its drink drive problem. A final estimate shows 240 people were killed by drivers over the legal drink drive limit in 2013, while provisional estimates suggest at least that number were killed in 2014. However, the number of people seriously injured in drink drive crashes did fall by eight per cent to 1,100 from 20