Skip to main content

Drivers need help to be 'eco-friendly', finds Kapsch

Environmental issues are a concern - but not enough for drivers to change routes, says new research
By David Arminas May 11, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The good old days before Coronavirus lockdowns (© Ali Cobanoglu | Dreamstime)

Roads are empty now due to Covid-19 lockdowns, but 70% of drivers are unhappy about congestion during normal rush hours, according to a new survey.

The top three negative effects that people complain about are worsening of the environment and air quality, longer travel times and higher levels of stress behind the wheel, says the Kapsch TrafficCom Index.

The survey questioned 1,000 people in each of nine countries -  US, Argentina, Chile, UK, Germany, Austria, France, Spain and Australia for a total 9,000 respondents.

Nine countries were involved in the survey.
Nine countries were involved in the survey.

With the exception of the US and Australia, where stress levels and travel time bother drivers most, air quality and environmental degradation is the number one negative effect cited in all other surveyed countries. Respondents most concerned with air quality and the environment are in Spain and Chile, where more than half of the survey participants pointed to this issue as number one.

However, the harmful impacts of congestion do not necessarily lead drivers to change their habits. When asked about their preferred routes, overall more than 60% of drivers want to shorten travel time rather than find an option with the lowest environmental impact. In the US, Austria and Argentina more than 40% are strongly convinced that saving time should be the primary consideration in choosing a route.

“The Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, and the discussions on the future of mobility all illustrate the need to balance personal and community interests,” said Georg Kapsch, chief executive of Kapsch TrafficCom, based in Austria. “The Kapsch TrafficCom Index shows us that drivers want to be more eco-friendly but need direction to help counteract negative mobility effects for themselves and their communities.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • No city is a traffic island
    April 2, 2024
    Beate Kubitz reflects on the rising tide of suburban drivers - and how cities across Europe are dealing with them as worries over air quality multiply
  • Why New York MTA needs $12bn – now!
    September 23, 2020
    Memo to US government: Public transit has been put under severe strain by Covid-19 – and New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority is sounding the alarm
  • Informal transport moves emerging megacities
    August 11, 2020
    If you want to get to work in emerging markets, the chances are you may not be using traditional public transit lines. Devin de Vries of WhereIsMyTransport makes the case for informal networks