Skip to main content

Drivers need help to be 'eco-friendly', finds Kapsch

Environmental issues are a concern - but not enough for drivers to change routes, says new research
By David Arminas May 11, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The good old days before Coronavirus lockdowns (© Ali Cobanoglu | Dreamstime)

Roads are empty now due to Covid-19 lockdowns, but 70% of drivers are unhappy about congestion during normal rush hours, according to a new survey.

The top three negative effects that people complain about are worsening of the environment and air quality, longer travel times and higher levels of stress behind the wheel, says the Kapsch TrafficCom Index.

The survey questioned 1,000 people in each of nine countries -  US, Argentina, Chile, UK, Germany, Austria, France, Spain and Australia for a total 9,000 respondents.

Nine countries were involved in the survey.
Nine countries were involved in the survey.

With the exception of the US and Australia, where stress levels and travel time bother drivers most, air quality and environmental degradation is the number one negative effect cited in all other surveyed countries. Respondents most concerned with air quality and the environment are in Spain and Chile, where more than half of the survey participants pointed to this issue as number one.

However, the harmful impacts of congestion do not necessarily lead drivers to change their habits. When asked about their preferred routes, overall more than 60% of drivers want to shorten travel time rather than find an option with the lowest environmental impact. In the US, Austria and Argentina more than 40% are strongly convinced that saving time should be the primary consideration in choosing a route.

“The Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, and the discussions on the future of mobility all illustrate the need to balance personal and community interests,” said Georg Kapsch, chief executive of Kapsch TrafficCom, based in Austria. “The Kapsch TrafficCom Index shows us that drivers want to be more eco-friendly but need direction to help counteract negative mobility effects for themselves and their communities.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Reducing injuries and deaths in US workzones shouldn’t be this complicated
    April 17, 2023
    In National Work Zone Awareness Week, surely the least we can do is to help get road workers home safely at the end of the day, says One.network's boss
  • Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    January 10, 2013
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort
  • Elon Musk’s underground movement
    August 3, 2020
    The Boring Company is building tunnels under various US cities – but for what? Kristina Smith delves deep into a project which may (eventually) have real appeal for mass transit providers and transportation agencies
  • Editor's comment: 'Let's be cautious about conclusions from life in lockdown'
    June 23, 2020

    So what have we found so far from life in lockdown? Not commuting has its benefits. Maybe more of us could work from home when technology allows. We all know how to Zoom now.

    What else? The lack of road traffic has given us cleaner air to breathe when we do go out, while more of us seem to be taking to our bicycles.

    Also, we know that what we've been doing across the world for the last few months is economically unsustainable - which is why restrictions are easing in many countries.