Skip to main content

Drivers need help to be 'eco-friendly', finds Kapsch

Environmental issues are a concern - but not enough for drivers to change routes, says new research
By David Arminas May 11, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The good old days before Coronavirus lockdowns (© Ali Cobanoglu | Dreamstime)

Roads are empty now due to Covid-19 lockdowns, but 70% of drivers are unhappy about congestion during normal rush hours, according to a new survey.

The top three negative effects that people complain about are worsening of the environment and air quality, longer travel times and higher levels of stress behind the wheel, says the Kapsch TrafficCom Index.

The survey questioned 1,000 people in each of nine countries -  US, Argentina, Chile, UK, Germany, Austria, France, Spain and Australia for a total 9,000 respondents.

Nine countries were involved in the survey.
Nine countries were involved in the survey.

With the exception of the US and Australia, where stress levels and travel time bother drivers most, air quality and environmental degradation is the number one negative effect cited in all other surveyed countries. Respondents most concerned with air quality and the environment are in Spain and Chile, where more than half of the survey participants pointed to this issue as number one.

However, the harmful impacts of congestion do not necessarily lead drivers to change their habits. When asked about their preferred routes, overall more than 60% of drivers want to shorten travel time rather than find an option with the lowest environmental impact. In the US, Austria and Argentina more than 40% are strongly convinced that saving time should be the primary consideration in choosing a route.

“The Covid-19 pandemic, climate change, and the discussions on the future of mobility all illustrate the need to balance personal and community interests,” said Georg Kapsch, chief executive of Kapsch TrafficCom, based in Austria. “The Kapsch TrafficCom Index shows us that drivers want to be more eco-friendly but need direction to help counteract negative mobility effects for themselves and their communities.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • EIT Mobility’s A-Z of Uvar
    January 31, 2023
    Well-implemented vehicle mobility schemes offer cities quick ways to improve the quality of urban life - and now EIT Mobility has written a guide to doing so. Andrew Stone has a read…
  • Demand-responsive transport keeps things flexible
    July 20, 2023
    Mobility needs change: Elena Ziller of OpenMove explains why demand-responsive transport is emerging as a hot mobility trend – and why it’s not without challenges
  • Support for speed cameras remains high – but some drivers need convincing
    October 29, 2015
    A national survey by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) has shown that although most drivers support speed cameras there are big variations across the country – and Londoners and people in the north-east appear to show higher levels of resistance than most. The survey polled 1,000 drivers of all age groups across Britain and asked “It is now common for the authorities to use speed cameras at the side of the road to identify vehicles involved in speeding offences. How acceptable do you think this i
  • Saving the smartphone zombies from themselves
    October 15, 2020
    As roads – particularly in cities – become busier, companies are fielding a steady trickle of products to keep pedestrians safe and vehicles flowing