Skip to main content

Research finds LED stop signs effect ‘similar to normal stop signs’

The results of a two-pronged investigation by researchers from the Minnesota Traffic Observatory at the US University of Minnesota on the safety related effects of flashing LED stop signs have just been released. They conducted two studies: a statistical study to compare the crash frequency after installation of a flashing LED stop signs at 15 intersections to a prediction of what that crash frequency would have been had the flashing LED stop signs not been installed; and a field study using video to exa
February 5, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The results of a two-pronged investigation by researchers from the Minnesota Traffic Observatory at the US 584 University of Minnesota on the safety related effects of flashing LED stop signs have just been released.

They conducted two studies: a statistical study to compare the crash frequency after installation of a flashing LED stop signs at 15 intersections to a prediction of what that crash frequency would have been had the flashing LED stop signs not been installed; and a field study using video to examine the behaviour of drivers approaching a stop-controlled intersection before and after the installation of a flashing LED stop sign.

The statistical study estimated the reduction in crashes at about 41.5 per cent, but with 95 per cent confidence this reduction could be anywhere between 0 per cent and 70.8 per cent. The conclusion was that installation of the flashing LED stop signs reduced the frequency of angle crashes but that the magnitude of this reduction was uncertain.

The field study found that before installation of the LED stop sign, there appeared to be no change in the relative proportion of clear stops versus clear non-stops when minor approach drivers did not face opposing traffic, but after installation of the flashing LED stop sign the relative proportion of clear stops increased for drivers who did encounter opposing traffic

The group came to the final conclusion that, although qualified by the relatively small sample sizes and wide confidence intervals, a reasonable interpretation is that flashing LED stop signs appear to have an effect similar to that of stop sign-mounted beacon.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Study says New Jersey voters strongly support red light cameras
    April 18, 2012
    The National Coalition for Safer Roads (NCSR) has released new research showing that New Jersey residents who took part in a survey it commissioned overwhelmingly support the use of red light safety cameras. The poll found that 77 per cent back the use of cameras at busy intersections in New Jersey, with 43 per cent saying they ‘strongly support’ the cameras.
  • Bogotá’s affordable path to safer roads
    April 28, 2022
    Enforcing speed limits on key corridors is a cost-effective way of reducing collisions in the Colombian capital, say the authors of a new study. Andrew Stone talks to them
  • SCATS study shows significant savings
    December 16, 2013
    Australian study quantifies the benefits of SCATS to the motorists, the environment and the economy. Opportunity weekday cost savings potential of some AUD16 million (US$15.2 million) has emerged from rigorous analysis of a one-day study of Australia’s Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) in operation. This represents 27% of the total cost of a real alternative semi-adaptive traffic control. The estimated indicative annual weekday-based value is AUD3,900 million (US$3,705 million) or 0.9% of t
  • Study shows road markings deliver cost-effective road safety
    June 20, 2012
    Road markings are among the most cost-effective solutions to make roads safer. A recent study carried out for the American Glass Bead Manufacturer’s Association quantifies by just how much Despite only making up 23% of the US mileage, fatalities on America’s rural two-lane highways made up 57% of all traffic fatalities in 2009 — resulting in more than $77Bn in losses for that year alone. Moreover, a rural motorist is 2.7 times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash per mile travelled than their urban