Skip to main content

Report calls for extension of point to point cameras

A report on the role of speed in vehicle crashes in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, makes a number of recommendations to isolate speed as a causal factor in crash rates by improving data collection and conducting specific research to identify the triggers for speeding, particularly in rural and regional areas. The report, by the Joint Standing Committee on Road Safety (Staysafe) also looks at the appropriateness of speed limits and approaches adopted in other jurisdictions and the adequacy of existing
November 18, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
A report on the role of speed in vehicle crashes in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, makes a number of recommendations to isolate speed as a causal factor in crash rates by improving data collection and conducting specific research to identify the triggers for speeding, particularly in rural and regional areas.

The report, by the Joint Standing Committee on Road Safety (Staysafe) also looks at the appropriateness of speed limits and approaches adopted in other jurisdictions and the adequacy of existing enforcement strategies, the deterrent value of demerit points and the importance of education and training for drivers, as well as for all other road users.

The report makes 26 recommendations, including the proposal that Transport for NSW considers extending the use of point-to-point cameras to cover all light and heavy vehicles, in order to ensure improved compliance with speed limits on NSW roads.

“The Committee is persuaded by evidence received that point-to-point cameras are highly effective in encouraging adherence to posted speed limits,” the report says.

A 2013 speed camera review showed that speed cameras are continuing to improve road safety in NSW. However, Staysafe claims speeding remains prevalent on Australian roads and looked at alternatives to high visibility policing and the use of speed cameras to reduce speeding behaviour.

These included intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) systems, aerial speed enforcement and good driver reward schemes. It recommends the investigation of compulsory user-pays installation of ISA systems for repeat speeding offenders and promotion of the Fair Go for Safer Drivers initiative, to increase awareness about existing rewards for drivers complying with speed limits and other road rules in the state.

According to the report, a trial of ISA in NSW found that 89 per cent of vehicles reduced speeding when fitted with ISA devices and says: “Furthermore, research conducted by MUARC showed that fitting every vehicle in Australia with intelligent speed adaptation systems would lead to a reduction in road fatalities of eight per cent and serious injury crashes by up to six per cent.”

The report also makes recommendations for more research into road safety, a review of double demerit points, analysis of speed cameras to determine which type is most effective, increasing the number of electronic speed advisory signs and variable message boards, a review of speed zones throughout NSW and public education campaigns to dissuade people from low-level speeding.

Committee chair Greg Aplin says the inquiry found that drivers respond well when double demerit points are introduced over holiday periods in tandem with a police presence.

Presenting the report, he said, "The visible cue is important, so the committee recommends greater use of electronic variable message boards to let drivers know they should adjust their speed, be it due to weather, hidden hazard, road condition or otherwise. Immediate feedback and improved driver education can help us change our ways on speed and bring greater credibility to road speed advisory signage."

Related Content

  • Speed camera law signed for six California cities
    October 19, 2023
    Enforcement pilots can start in LA, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale, Long Beach & San Francisco
  • Electronic toll collection delivers efficient traffic regulation
    February 3, 2012
    Electronic tolling systems have been in use for decades now. Worldwide, steadily more and more tolling systems are being set into operation, providing efficient means for traffic regulation and financing of infrastructure. But despite this maturity enforcement is still not being given the consideration it deserves. Q-Free's Steinar Furan writes
  • Most crash reports do not capture critical data, says National Safety Council
    April 25, 2017
    A National Safety Council review of motor vehicle crash reports from across the US found no state fully captures critical data needed to address and understand the rise in roadway fatalities. Crash reports from all 50 states lack fields or codes for law enforcement to record the level of driver fatigue at the time of a crash, while many others lack fields to capture texting, hands-free cell phone use and specific types of drug use if drugs are detected, including marijuana. Excluding these fields limits the
  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe