Skip to main content

Investors point to bright future for micromobility

Some big names are looking to invest in transportation companies – and this new confidence in the future of MaaS and micromobility indicates a step change, says Ito World’s Johan Herrlin
By Sampo Hietanen January 23, 2020 Read time: 4 mins

The mobility sector has demonstrated its potential to grow by conquering markets worldwide: China, Europe and the US have seen an uptake in the use of micromobility services in the past few years. The expansion led to an unsurprising growth in investments and it is thus predicted to grow from $6.8 billion in 2020 to $106.8bn by 2030.

Among the many venture capital (VC) firms supporting mobility opportunities are big names like InMotion Ventures, backed by Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) and the Vision Fund, SoftBank’s technology-focused VC fund. The Tokyo-based holding company funds the likes of Uber, GetAround, Slack and WeWork and has thrown its weight behind transportation, which now takes up 40% of its portfolio. This constitutes almost twice as much as the Vision Fund’s next biggest category – consumer tech. SoftBank isn’t the only one pouring money into the tech, transportation and logistics space. Uber’s co-founder Travis Kalanick invested $150m in City Storage Systems and Amazon spent $575m to fund Deliveroo; these are some of the bigger, better known investments but certainly not the only ones.

The recent disappointing performance of growth-over-profit focused companies such as Ofo, Uber, Lyft, Slack, and the now delayed initial public offering (IPO) of WeWork appear to signal a shift in focus from investors towards companies with a more sustainable, clear path to profitability. This will likely lead to less speculative investments and a consolidation in the micromobility market as investors tighten the reins. It could also signal that consumers may face an increase in mobility prices as companies are likely to have less cash to subsidise price wars in market share battles of the likes we’ve seen in the past few years.

A further look into the Vision Fund’s portfolio reveals another trend in the technology of transportation – interest in autonomous vehicles. The VC firm made investments both in companies manufacturing self-driving vehicles, and in those that contribute to their technological advancement, e.g. by developing smarter and safer driving artificial intelligence (AI). These investments are a clear indicator of the future of transportation and this interest is backed not only by VCs but also by players already in the transportation market, i.e. car manufacturers. Companies like Tesla, who have acquired a computer vision company, or InMotion Ventures, recently backing an autonomous car manufacturer, are gearing up towards releasing their self-driving cars, as everyone wants to be first on the market to offer Level 4 automation. These investments are a sign of the mobility market coming to maturity.

Confidence and stability

Companies already in the Mobility as a Service (MaaS) market feel the competition and are preparing for a more connected and autonomous future as well. Uber, for example, has expressed its intention to become the “Amazon of transportation”. It has already moved in this direction by adding bikes to its offering and integrating public transport timetables within the app. It is competing with companies such as VuLog and Aimo that are combining multiple providers in multiple cities on one platform to provide a more integrated and consumer-friendly experience. Another factor bringing confidence and stability into the market is the increasing amount of regulations coming into play, making city administrators and investors feel more confident in the possibilities MaaS and micromobility can provide. The former no longer feel threatened by the possibility of a sudden takeover of their city by bikes that would disrupt the normal flow of transport. This, in turn, encourages VCs to invest more, creating more certainty. T
hese changes in the transportation industry reflect a shift in behaviour among the general population: fewer younger people have a driving licence and more live in bigger cities, where having a car is expensive and not convenient.

MaaS is no longer driven by one company as the market has grown. Recent investments into Uber and other micromobility players, like Bird, Lyme and Jump, show a clear picture for the future of the industry. A future where MaaS-enabled mobility services are integrated into an ecosystem that allows commuters not to own a car and still have a smooth commute with public transport, car- and/or bike-sharing.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Micromobility must focus on safety, says Trafi
    July 10, 2019
    Micromobility must focus on safety and lowering accidents as much as possible, says technology firm Trafi. Speaking at the TaaS (Transportation as a Service) Conference in the UK city of Birmingham this week, Sigrid Dalberg-Krajewski, head of marketing and communications at Trafi, says electric scooters can be unlocked by someone who is drunk or under the age of 18. “But it is not only about restricting usage, it is also about connecting cities in the suburban areas and how to incentivise these people
  • Trust me, I'm a driverless car
    October 12, 2018
    Developing C/AV technology is the easy bit: now the vehicles need to gain people’s confidence. So does the public feel safe in driverless hands – and how much might they be willing to pay for the privilege? The Venturer consortium’s final user and technology test (Trial 3) explored levels of user trust in scenarios where a connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) is interacting with cyclists, pedestrians and other road users on a controlled road network. Trial 3 consisted of experimental runs in the
  • Ofo ‘scales back’ bike sharing operations in US
    July 24, 2018
    Chinese bike sharing company Ofo is scaling back its US operations and has laid off employees from multiple departments. The move, according to a report by Quartz, will allow the company to refocus on markets in a bid to become profitable. The start-up plans to continue operating in US cities such as Seattle, San Diego and New York. According to Quartz, the company is also leaving Australia and Israel and reducing operations in the UK. The company operates yellow bicycles which riders can rent thro
  • The case for integrating urban traffic control and parking
    February 3, 2012
    Although urban traffic control and parking management are inextricably linked in so many ways, there remain fundamental differences which undermine closer integration. Car parking guidance systems can have a significant, positive impact on congestion in town and city centres, however conflicting business models still stand in the way of the more profound integration of car parking management and Urban Traffic Control (UTC) systems.