Skip to main content

Investors point to bright future for micromobility

Some big names are looking to invest in transportation companies – and this new confidence in the future of MaaS and micromobility indicates a step change, says Ito World’s Johan Herrlin
By Sampo Hietanen January 23, 2020 Read time: 4 mins

The mobility sector has demonstrated its potential to grow by conquering markets worldwide: China, Europe and the US have seen an uptake in the use of micromobility services in the past few years. The expansion led to an unsurprising growth in investments and it is thus predicted to grow from $6.8 billion in 2020 to $106.8bn by 2030.

Among the many venture capital (VC) firms supporting mobility opportunities are big names like InMotion Ventures, backed by Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) and the Vision Fund, SoftBank’s technology-focused VC fund. The Tokyo-based holding company funds the likes of Uber, GetAround, Slack and WeWork and has thrown its weight behind transportation, which now takes up 40% of its portfolio. This constitutes almost twice as much as the Vision Fund’s next biggest category – consumer tech. SoftBank isn’t the only one pouring money into the tech, transportation and logistics space. Uber’s co-founder Travis Kalanick invested $150m in City Storage Systems and Amazon spent $575m to fund Deliveroo; these are some of the bigger, better known investments but certainly not the only ones.

The recent disappointing performance of growth-over-profit focused companies such as Ofo, Uber, Lyft, Slack, and the now delayed initial public offering (IPO) of WeWork appear to signal a shift in focus from investors towards companies with a more sustainable, clear path to profitability. This will likely lead to less speculative investments and a consolidation in the micromobility market as investors tighten the reins. It could also signal that consumers may face an increase in mobility prices as companies are likely to have less cash to subsidise price wars in market share battles of the likes we’ve seen in the past few years.

A further look into the Vision Fund’s portfolio reveals another trend in the technology of transportation – interest in autonomous vehicles. The VC firm made investments both in companies manufacturing self-driving vehicles, and in those that contribute to their technological advancement, e.g. by developing smarter and safer driving artificial intelligence (AI). These investments are a clear indicator of the future of transportation and this interest is backed not only by VCs but also by players already in the transportation market, i.e. car manufacturers. Companies like Tesla, who have acquired a computer vision company, or InMotion Ventures, recently backing an autonomous car manufacturer, are gearing up towards releasing their self-driving cars, as everyone wants to be first on the market to offer Level 4 automation. These investments are a sign of the mobility market coming to maturity.

Confidence and stability

Companies already in the Mobility as a Service (MaaS) market feel the competition and are preparing for a more connected and autonomous future as well. Uber, for example, has expressed its intention to become the “Amazon of transportation”. It has already moved in this direction by adding bikes to its offering and integrating public transport timetables within the app. It is competing with companies such as VuLog and Aimo that are combining multiple providers in multiple cities on one platform to provide a more integrated and consumer-friendly experience. Another factor bringing confidence and stability into the market is the increasing amount of regulations coming into play, making city administrators and investors feel more confident in the possibilities MaaS and micromobility can provide. The former no longer feel threatened by the possibility of a sudden takeover of their city by bikes that would disrupt the normal flow of transport. This, in turn, encourages VCs to invest more, creating more certainty. T
hese changes in the transportation industry reflect a shift in behaviour among the general population: fewer younger people have a driving licence and more live in bigger cities, where having a car is expensive and not convenient.

MaaS is no longer driven by one company as the market has grown. Recent investments into Uber and other micromobility players, like Bird, Lyme and Jump, show a clear picture for the future of the industry. A future where MaaS-enabled mobility services are integrated into an ecosystem that allows commuters not to own a car and still have a smooth commute with public transport, car- and/or bike-sharing.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Reducing detection costs benefits intersection management
    February 3, 2012
    The continuing, favourable performance-versus-cost situation concerning detection and monitoring technologies is driving the proliferation of intelligence across road networks. The effective and safe management of intersections is a focus for network operators and systems manufacturers alike. The most complicated of road environments, and statistically among the least safe, intersections enjoy particular emphasis in longer-term work on cooperative infrastructure solutions. However there are current developm
  • The need to accelerate systems standardisation
    January 31, 2012
    While the US has achieved an appreciable level of success when it comes to implementation of standards-based systems at the urban and intersection control levels, the overall standards implementation effort is not progressing at anywhere near a level commensurate with the size of the country and its population, says Christy Peebles, business unit manager with Siemens Industry, Inc.'s Mobility Division. She attributes the situation to a number of factors: "There's a big element of 'Not Invented Here' syndro
  • MaaS by any other name
    February 6, 2020
    Has the roll-out of Mobility as a Service stalled - or could it just be that multimodal travel is simply happening under a variety of different names?
  • Smart Cities put people, prudence and businesses before technology
    December 4, 2014
    Caroline Haynes tells ITS International that transport planners and equipment suppliers need to adopt different thinking and the smartest cities don’t call themselves smart. The term Smart Cities has been around for some time and has become something of a catch-all term applied to novel or futuristic technology deployed in an urban setting.