Skip to main content

Vulnerable road users face safety problems

Concern is growing in Europe over the safety standards for vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and powered two wheeler riders. A total of 169,000 pedestrians, cyclists and users of powered two-wheeled vehicles (PTW) have been killed on European roads since 2001; 15,300 of them in 2009. The figures have been published in the new Road Safety Performance Index (PIN) report and reveal a decrease in the number of deaths by 34% for pedestrians and cyclists, and just 18% for PTW riders compared to
May 18, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSSConcern is growing in Europe over the safety standards for vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and powered two wheeler riders. A total of 169,000 pedestrians, cyclists and users of powered two-wheeled vehicles (PTW) have been killed on European roads since 2001; 15,300 of them in 2009. The figures have been published in the new Road Safety Performance Index (PIN) report and reveal a decrease in the number of deaths by 34% for pedestrians and cyclists, and just 18% for PTW riders compared to the baseline year of 2001. While the number of total road deaths decreased considerably over the 2001-2010 decade, the number of killed PTW riders actually increased in 13 EU countries. This is a major cause for concern as it runs counter to the safety gains seen for vehicle users in Europe.

The 1690 European Commission prioritised PTW users in its Road Safety Policy Orientation last year but is so far struggling to comprehend both the scale of the problem as well as the means required to deal with it. Worse still, although pedestrians and cyclists were identified as a vulnerable group, little was proposed to address the risks they face.

Transport Ministers in December 2010 called for the development of a specific strategy to tackle safety of this target group. Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are now preparing to adopt a Report on Road Safety, to stress the need for action to reduce road deaths amongst the most vulnerable road users. European Transport Safety Commission (ETSC) executive director Antonio Avenoso explains that experiences from fast progressing countries show that measures exist which are both affordable and effective in saving the lives of many unprotected road users.

The fastest reductions since 2001 among pedestrian deaths were recorded in Portugal, Sweden, Norway and Belgium, and among cyclist deaths in Finland, Lithuania, Slovakia and Latvia. For moped and motorcycle deaths, best reductions have been achieved in Portugal and Latvia, followed by Belgium and Ireland. ETSC is releasing this new data to mark the launch of the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety. Many vulnerable road users are being killed worldwide and the situation in the EU is no exception. Part of the problem is that while road safety features have been introduced that increase the safety of occupants sitting inside vehicles, these same features can sometimes themselves pose risks for vulnerable road users.

Wire rope barriers in particular have been the focus of some scrutiny for while these can protect vehicle occupants they have been directly linked to horrific injuries amongst powered two wheeler users.

Data shows that the biggest risk to vulnerable road users comes from bad driving by vehicle users. While road authorities have attempted to improve safety for vulnerable road users by introducing various measures, these have largely ignored the biggest problem, the issue of bad driving by vehicle users. As a result, safety gains for vulnerable road users have been at best comparatively small and the research reveals that unless the real problem is addressed, that of badly driven vehicles, vulnerable road users will continue to pay a heavy burden.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Development banks pledge US$175 billion for clean transport
    June 21, 2012
    Eight of the world’s largest multilateral development banks (MDBs) banks yesterday pledged to invest US$175 billion over the next 10 years to support sustainable transport in developing countries. The pledge was made at the UN Sustainable Development Conference in Rio de Janeiro (Rio+20) by the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, CAF- Development Bank of Latin America, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, Islamic Developme
  • Do satellites provide a heavenly view of tolling’s future?
    December 16, 2014
    Satellite-based tolling opens up new options for authorities and can be integrated with DSRC systems as David Crawford discovers. As the proud custodian of the European Union (EU)’s longest road network covered by a single (truck) charging scheme – and the only one to include all major roads - Slovakia has become the continent’s poster-nation for the virtues of GNSS/CN (Global Navigation Satellite System/Cellular Network)-based tolling. It is also proved to be a very fast implementer. Speaking at the 2014 I
  • TRL: Cities must do more to help VRUs
    May 9, 2019
    UK cities must learn from the Netherlands and Denmark if active travel and increased safety for vulnerable road users are to co-exist, says TRL’s Marcus Jones Active travel’ refers to modes of transport in which physical effort is required to undertake purposeful journeys - for example, walking or cycling to school, work or the local shops, as well as walking and standing as part of accessing public transport. The benefits of replacing short car journeys with more active forms of transport are obvious. Act
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London