Skip to main content

US introduces cycle traffic signals

Cycle-specific traffic signals, which are common in Europe and Australia, are now being introduced in the US alongside the more familiar traditional intersection control signals. At least sixteen US cities, including Austin, Denver, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington DC, have installed the lights, which feature a bicycle-shaped signal, according to an October study commissioned by the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. The study found that cyclists ca
December 5, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
Cycle-specific traffic signals, which are common in Europe and Australia, are now being introduced in the US alongside the more familiar traditional intersection control signals.

At least sixteen US cities, including Austin, Denver, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington DC, have installed the lights, which feature a bicycle-shaped signal, according to an October study commissioned by the 5837 Oregon Department of Transportation and the 831 Federal Highway Administration.

The study found that cyclists can be at risk when entering an intersection on an amber signal that allows enough time for cars to clear the intersection, but not for cycles.  Even traditional green lights may not allow enough time for a cyclist to cross from a stopped position.   By allowing the cyclist a few seconds head start, the signals can also help prevent collisions when a motorist is turning right and a cyclist is going straight on.
According to the study, some cycle signals are stand-alone, while others are incorporated into normal traffic signals; some are timed, while others are activated when a cyclist approaches the intersection.

Gary Obery, Oregon Department of Transportation senior traffic engineer, said cyclists have to obey the signals like other vehicles approaching a traffic signal. He pointed out that there is currently no national standard for these signals since their use is still growing.

"At some point they will appear in our national standards, but that process involves trying things out and seeing what works best," he said. At least two states have passed laws setting out rules and regulations for them. California was the first, in the early 2000s. Last year Oregon lawmakers approved Senate Bill 130, adding cycle-only signals to the state's list of traffic control devices.

The signals are being used in cities that are trying to make streets more bicycle friendly and in intersections that are more complex, Obery said.

Chicago officials announced the city's first cycle-specific traffic signal in August. Atlanta got its first bike signal in October. In November, Oregon's capital city of Salem joined four other Oregon communities with bicycle traffic signals.

The bicycle signal cost US$1,000 to install in Salem, according to assistant city traffic manager Tony Martin.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • AVs in the Netherlands? Don't forget the bikes
    June 11, 2019
    The Netherlands’ famous love of bicycles could be a problem when it comes to the deployment of autonomous vehicles there. And there might be other obstacles, finds Ben Spencer Of all the countries on the planet, the Netherlands is most ready to start deploying autonomous vehicles (AVs), according to a survey by KPMG earlier this year. On the face of it, this is good news: coming first out of 25 countries listed in the Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index (AVRI) for the second consecutive year puts the Du
  • Traffic signal priority initiatives aid better bus travel
    March 15, 2012
    David Crawford investigates traffic signal priority initiatives developing for better bus travel on the US Pacific Coast Transit patronage rises by an average of 35% along commuter corridors equipped with bus rapid transit (BRT) systems, according to the US Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration (FTA). BRT as defined as bus transit enhanced with ITS systems for better services, is winning new passengers attracted by opportunity to avoid increasing fuel costs and traffic congestion.
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
  • Use of ITS technology grows more prevalent in safety applications
    January 30, 2012
    Transportation agencies and governments are using ITS technology to protect critical infrastructure from terrorist attack and other threats to economic security and public safety. Andrew Bardin Williams reports. It is no secret that we live in a potentially dangerous world. Terrorism as seen on 9/11 in the United States, subsequent attacks in London, Moscow and Madrid and other acts of violence across the developing world have made vigilance the watchword for ensuring security. Key infrastructure is now bei