SmartDrive launch new suite of sensors to tackle high-risk driving behaviour

SmartDrive Systems has introduced its SmartSense for Distracted Driving (SSDD), the first in a new line of intelligent sensors that are designed with the intention of identifying dangerous driving habits and intervening with drivers before a catastrophic event occurs. It uses computer vision-based algorithms along with SmartDrive’s video analytics platform to recognize when a driver is distracted.
November 2, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
639 SmartDrive Systems has introduced its SmartSense for Distracted Driving (SSDD), the first in a new line of intelligent sensors that are designed with the intention of identifying dangerous driving habits and intervening with drivers before a catastrophic event occurs. It uses computer vision-based algorithms along with SmartDrive’s video analytics platform to recognize when a driver is distracted.


When combined with the SmartDrive program and its extended recording capability, SSDD informs fleets of what led the driver to distraction, how it manifested, and the outcome; enabling them to provide detailed feedback and actionable coaching to improve driver safety.

These purpose-built sensors combine with engine computer data, telematics, accelerometer and SmartDrive analytic data. Through a reviewed video and training database of over 200 million analysed driving events, the sensor’s algorithms can be tuned to optimise triggering efficacy and system performance.

SSDD interprets driver cues proven to indicate distraction such as head and eye movements and triggers a video whenever distraction, inattention or drowsiness is detected, which is prioritized and offloaded for immediate verification and intervention, allowing fleets to act quickly.

Other features include purpose-built hardware with infrared sensors that capture distraction even when sunglasses are worn as well as in-cab alerts when distraction or inattention occurs. In addition, it features a prioritized review and risk scoring for video distraction events and integrates with the SmartDrive video safety program.

Video evidence from the SmartDrive library has revealed that drivers who engage in distracted driving frequently demonstrate an over-reliance on their ability to respond to dangerous situations, should they occur, such as putting themselves in perceived safe modes prior to texting. In these situations, drivers move to the right lane using cruise control at or below the speed limit, and position themselves in limited surrounding traffic or at a distance that appears safe. Additionally, drivers regularly misjudge the length of time and frequency of their distraction, texting for a longer time period than estimated, as well as diverting their eyes from the road more frequently and for more time than perceived.

Steve Mitgang CEO of SmartDrive, said: “It’s estimated that distracted driving accounts for 10% of all fatal crashes and 17% of all collisions that cause injuries—at a cost of at least $129 billion annually. Given the difficulty of proving distraction as a root cause, these numbers are probably low. With SmartSense for Distracted Driving, we’re tackling this issue head-on by delivering an intelligent sensor tuned specifically to this risk. And, because it’s delivered with our video safety program, fleets finally have both a comprehensive view of the frequency, severity and impact of distracted driving, and a solution to an industry epidemic that costs money and lives.”

UTC

Related Content

  • December 12, 2014
    Infrastructure and the autonomous vehicle
    Harold Worrall ponders the effect of autonomous vehicles on transportation infrastructure. For the last century the transportation industry has been focused on the supply of infrastructure to support the ever growing fleet of vehicles and the greater number of miles covered by each vehicle. Our focus has been planning, funding, designing, building and maintaining roadways. Politicians, engineers, planners, financial managers … all of us have had this focus. We have experienced demand growth since the first
    Read More
  • December 4, 2012
    ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
    Read More
  • August 19, 2019
    TRL: In-vehicle tech is developing – but the driver isn’t
    The evidence base for distracted driving has failed to keep up with technological developments, argue TRL’s Neale Kinnear and Paul Jackson. New research is urgently needed
    Read More
  • January 7, 2013
    Need for secure approach to connected vehicle technology
    Accidental or malicious issue of false messages to connected vehicles could result in dire consequences, so secure systems of authentication and certification are likely to be necessary, write Paul Avery and Sandra Dykes. Connectivity among vehicles in urban traffic systems will provide opportunity for beneficial impacts such as congestion reduction and greater safety. However, it also creates security risks with the potential for targeted disruption. Security algorithms, protocols and procedures must take
    Read More

Highlighted Content