Skip to main content

Smart signal software ‘has potential for ICM’

Software developed by researchers from the University of Minnesota for the Smart (Systematic Monitoring of Arterial Road and Traffic Signals) signal system automatically collects and processes data from traffic signal controllers at multiple intersections. It then creates performance measures, including information on the times and locations congestion occurs on a roadway. A new version of the software has been deployed at more than fifty intersections managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportatio
September 26, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
Software developed by researchers from the 584 University of Minnesota for the Smart (Systematic Monitoring of Arterial Road and Traffic Signals) signal system automatically collects and processes data from traffic signal controllers at multiple intersections. It then creates performance measures, including information on the times and locations congestion occurs on a roadway.

A new version of the software has been deployed at more than fifty intersections managed by the 2103 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), enabling Smart signal to retrieve traffic data direct from signal controllers without any additional hardware instrumentation, reducing both the time and cost associated with implementation.

Researchers are now turning their attention to investigations into how Smart signal could be used as part of an integrated corridor management (ICM) system.

The proposed ICM system would use the performance measures generated by the system to diagnose incidents on signalised arterials and propose new signal control strategies that could be deployed in real time to mitigate traffic congestion.

The system also aims to reduce overall network congestion by using the available capacity of parallel routes, for example, by rerouting traffic from a freeway to a parallel signalised arterial during times of peak traffic congestion or when a crash occurs. In this case, Smart signal could help identify and predict the effects of rerouting travellers to the arterial and then automatically adjust signal timing to compensate for the increased traffic.

The study tested the proposed ICM system using a traffic simulation and results have shown that the system significantly reduces network congestion; the average delay and number of stops per vehicle was reduced and average vehicle speed increased.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Jenoptik supplies sophisticated multi-section control project
    November 17, 2014
    Efficient speed enforcement in the most highly frequented tunnel in Austria on the A7 near Linz. The Bindermichl-Niedernhart tunnel complex on Austrian highway A7 connects the major east/west A1 route from Vienna/ Bratislava to Munich/Salzburg with the A7/ E55 running south from Prague in the Czech Republic. This happens right in the middle of the city of Linz, Austria.
  • B&C Transit modernises Miami-Dade Metrorail’s control systems
    June 1, 2016
    Jason Gomez and Daniel Mondesir describe how passenger disruption was minimised during a major upgrading of the control room of Miami-Dade’s Metrorail. In 1984 when the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works’ (DTPW) Metrorail system was launched in southern Florida, trains ran 18km along a single line and stopped at 10 stations.
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • TRL: In-vehicle tech is developing – but the driver isn’t
    August 19, 2019
    The evidence base for distracted driving has failed to keep up with technological developments, argue TRL’s Neale Kinnear and Paul Jackson. New research is urgently needed