Skip to main content

Smart signal software ‘has potential for ICM’

Software developed by researchers from the University of Minnesota for the Smart (Systematic Monitoring of Arterial Road and Traffic Signals) signal system automatically collects and processes data from traffic signal controllers at multiple intersections. It then creates performance measures, including information on the times and locations congestion occurs on a roadway. A new version of the software has been deployed at more than fifty intersections managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportatio
September 26, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
Software developed by researchers from the 584 University of Minnesota for the Smart (Systematic Monitoring of Arterial Road and Traffic Signals) signal system automatically collects and processes data from traffic signal controllers at multiple intersections. It then creates performance measures, including information on the times and locations congestion occurs on a roadway.

A new version of the software has been deployed at more than fifty intersections managed by the 2103 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), enabling Smart signal to retrieve traffic data direct from signal controllers without any additional hardware instrumentation, reducing both the time and cost associated with implementation.

Researchers are now turning their attention to investigations into how Smart signal could be used as part of an integrated corridor management (ICM) system.

The proposed ICM system would use the performance measures generated by the system to diagnose incidents on signalised arterials and propose new signal control strategies that could be deployed in real time to mitigate traffic congestion.

The system also aims to reduce overall network congestion by using the available capacity of parallel routes, for example, by rerouting traffic from a freeway to a parallel signalised arterial during times of peak traffic congestion or when a crash occurs. In this case, Smart signal could help identify and predict the effects of rerouting travellers to the arterial and then automatically adjust signal timing to compensate for the increased traffic.

The study tested the proposed ICM system using a traffic simulation and results have shown that the system significantly reduces network congestion; the average delay and number of stops per vehicle was reduced and average vehicle speed increased.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Growing ITS capability, a way to increase infrastructure capacity
    February 2, 2012
    Iteris's Greg McKhann makes the case for policymakers to look more seriously at the use of ITS as a means of increasing existing infrastructure capacity
  • Green requirements of traffic video systems
    February 2, 2012
    Traficon's Head of Product and Application Management Robin Collaert offers up a discussion of the likely future green requirements of traffic video systems. At the most basic levels, ITS has the potential to significantly reduce the amounts of time which vehicles spend waiting at intersections, and less time spent waiting means less in the way of vehicular emissions. All of that will hardly come as news to most laypeople, let alone transport professionals. However, the reality is that even today too many r
  • New York’s Midtown in Motion traffic management system wins ITS America award
    June 6, 2012
    ITS America has recognised the New York City Department of Transportation (NYC DoT) for Midtown in Motion, the sophisticated traffic management system launched last July that uses ITS to ease traffic congestion, improve traffic flow, and reduce greenhouse emissions and air pollution on the city’s most congested streets. Coinciding with the award, NYC DoT announced that it is expanding the system, which currently covers 110-square blocks, to cover 270-square blocks in the city’s most heavily congested neighb
  • Cooperative infrastructure systems waiting for the go ahead
    February 3, 2012
    Despite much research and technological promise, progress towards cooperative infrastructure system deployment is still slow. Here, Robert Cone and John Miles take a considered look at how and when it might come about. From a systems engineering viewpoint it looks logical and inevitable that vehicles should be communicating between themselves and with the road infrastructure. But seen from a business viewpoint the case is not proven.