Skip to main content

Report calls for per-mile road charging scheme in London

London’s mayor Sadiq Khan has been urged to replace the city’s existing road charge schemes with a single system that charges drivers per mile. Called City Move, the scheme would apply in areas of high demand and poor air quality. Rates would vary by vehicle emissions, local levels of congestion and pollution and availability of public transport alternatives – but would be set before the journey begins. A report by thinktank Centre for London - Green Light: Next Generation of Road User Charging for a Hea
April 30, 2019 Read time: 3 mins

London’s mayor Sadiq Khan has been urged to replace the city’s existing road charge schemes with a single system that charges drivers per mile.

Called City Move, the scheme would apply in areas of high demand and poor air quality. Rates would vary by vehicle emissions, local levels of congestion and pollution and availability of public transport alternatives – but would be set before the journey begins.

A %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external report false https://www.centreforlondon.org/publication/road-user-charging/ false false%>by thinktank Centre for London - Green Light: Next Generation of Road User Charging for a Healthier, More Liveable London - insists City Move would reflect the true level of vehicle usage and its contribution to congestion and pollution. It would also consider the impact of individual journeys in terms of road surface damage, economic costs and environmental damage.

Centre for London claims City Move has the following benefits:

•    Tackle city-wide air pollution – charging drivers on the most congested roads the equivalent of a cup of coffee or a bus ticket could reduce total emissions and air pollution levels across the whole of London by up to a fifth (over and above the anticipated impact of the current Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ).

•    Better experience on the roads – the scheme would reduce congestion and allow investment in roads maintenance, creating a better journey for all road users.

•    Better for business – the scheme could reduce traffic overall, thereby reducing delays and helping business to make efficiency savings.

Additionally, the report sets out plans for a multimodal platform integrated with the rest of the capital's transport system. Available as an app and website, it would allow users to compare, plan and pay for journeys using a range of travel options available. The solution would compare relative costs and impacts of taking the bus, tube, train, car-sharing, taxi hailing, bike hire, cycling or walking to help users make informed choices.

Looking ahead, the report recommends Sadiq Khan should ask Transport for London to develop options for a new approach to road user charging, with a view to introducing the first version by the end of the 2020-24 mayoral term.

According to Centre for London, this would include developing a customer platform, upgrading the required GPS and mobile network capacity and a trial to test the technology.

Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, says the report highlights the need for rules and regulations to be simple to understand and easy to plan for if they have any chance of working smoothly and attracting public support.

“One wonders whether this is the case in London – and increasingly in other towns and cities across the country – where drivers are confronted with an array of charges designed to do different things across different geographical areas,” he continues. “Many could be forgiven for confusing their CCs, CAZs and ULEZs.”

Caroline Pidgeon, Liberal Democrat assembly member, says: “We need a radical overhaul of the growing number of road user charges and instead move to a single comprehensive system that directly tackles congestion and air pollution wherever it occurs in the capital.”

UTC

Related Content

  • February 5, 2019
    Uber suspends Barcelona service after new regulations introduced
    Taxi-hailing giant Uber is suspending its service in the Spanish city of Barcelona. The move comes after new regulations were passed by local authorities, according to Reuters. The company started its UberX service in the city last year. But from now on, passengers using ride-hailing services will have to wait at least 15 minutes after booking a ride before they can be picked up – thus negating one of the key selling points of companies such as Uber. Speed and convenience – as well as cost – are w
  • April 18, 2019
    Quarter of Brits ‘would fund smart city solutions from tax’
    Almost a quarter (24%) of British people would be willing to fund smart city solutions using their own tax contributions, according to new research from ATG Access. Part of road barrier specialist ATG’s ‘Smart cities: Turning the dream into a reality’ report, the research found that more than half (57%) would be happy for their tax to go towards smart traffic lights, and 44% for smarter signs which give real-time traffic updates. Nearly a quarter (24%) said they would also be willing to fund smart barrie
  • April 17, 2019
    Lyft recalls 3,000 e-bikes across US
    Ride-hailing company Lyft has recalled 3,000 electric bikes from cities in the US because of concerns over their braking systems. The brands affected are Citi Bike in New York, Capital Bikeshare in Washington, DC, and the Bay Area’s Ford GoBike. A similar statement on each company’s website says: “We recently received a small number of reports from riders who experienced stronger than expected braking force on the front wheel. Out of an abundance of caution, we are proactively removing the pedal-assi
  • December 4, 2012
    Europe calls for guidance on evaluating ITS projects
    A European Commission study report has revealed a lack of consistency or standard practice for evaluating the funding needs and fiscal performance of ITS projects. New guidelines are urgently needed for monitoring public funding of ITS schemes, says a recent report from the European Commission (EC). A specially-commissioned study has found no readily available comparative analysis of transport funding schemes and ITS investment methodologies to support project decision making. A survey of nine EU member sta