Skip to main content

Prison sentence for holding a mobile device while driving

As of 1 February, it will be illegal for drivers in Singapore to hold any type of mobile device while driving. Previously, only calling or texting someone on a mobile phone was barred. Anyone caught holding any mobile device, phone or tablet, while driving can be found guilty of committing an offence; this means mobile phones and tablets. The new changes include not just talking or texting but also surfing the web, visiting social media sites and downloading material. The law also applies to just hold
February 5, 2015 Read time: 4 mins
As of 1 February, it will be illegal for drivers in Singapore to hold any type of mobile device while driving. Previously, only calling or texting someone on a mobile phone was barred.

Anyone caught holding any mobile device, phone or tablet, while driving can be found guilty of committing an offence; this means mobile phones and tablets.

The new changes include not just talking or texting but also surfing the web, visiting social media sites and downloading material. The law also applies to just holding a device while driving.  It is not illegal to use a mobile device when the car is stationary. But motorists are strongly advised not to handle their device at a red light. It is not illegal to use a mobile device that is mounted on a holder or dashboard.

First-time offenders can be fined up to US$750 and/or jailed for up to six months. Repeat offenders face up to US$1,500 in fines and/or up to 12 months in jail.

The amended law does not specifically mention wearable technology such as the Google Glass, but the use of such devices could be classified as inconsiderate driving, an offence which carries up to a US$750 fine and a six-month jail term.

Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Masagos Zulkifli commented on this during the amendment of the law in parliament on Sept 8, 2014, saying: "We will continue to monitor the situation... and study the practices of other jurisdictions as they evolve to deal with (new) types of smart devices."

National car leasing company Flexed.co.uk says it's high time that similar harsher sentences were considered for British drivers.

"For many, texting or phoning behind the wheel is still seen as an acceptable risk," says Flexed.co.uk spokesperson Mark Hall, "People still do it because they know their chances of being caught are slim. But would the prospect of a prison sentence deter British drivers? We think it would."

7990 Flexed.co.uk asked British drivers if they would avoid texting or phoning at the wheel if there was a prospect of a prison sentence, and the vast majority said it would totally deter them from taking the risk.

Comments included Anwar from Leeds, who said: "I always keep my phone out of reach when I'm driving. I can't trust myself with the temptation, especially if there's any chance of ending up in court."

Asha of Salford said: "Prison? Absolutely right. You think it couldn't happen to you, but I had a near miss because I picked up the phone on the M6 and nearly rear-ended a lorry. I deserved to be locked up because I had family in the back seat."

John from Cardiff said he was guilty of it on occasion. “But I'd pack it in the day they bring out thousand-pound fines and losing your liberty."

Less than one in ten of drivers interviewed by Flexed said that harsher punishments wouldn't stop them from phoning, texting or even updating their social media timelines while driving.

Typical was Melanie from London, who said: "I've never been caught and I don't think I ever will. I don't care."

Flexed.co.uk says that British drivers only end up in court if they have been involved in an accident while using their phone illegally, and thinks that this is the wrong way of addressing the problem.

"In this case the law only reacts with severity after unacceptable behaviour has resulted in a serious accident, "says Hall. “Think of it as a workplace health and safety issue: When you have people driving tons of machinery at high speed while distracted by something that is already illegal, the law should be about preventing accidents, not reacting after it's far too late."

Statistics from a number of influential studies into mobile phones and driving find that 23 per cent of motor accidents are now caused by drivers being distracted by a mobile device.

Text messaging, studies say, makes an accident 28 times more likely because of the longer time driver attention is taken from the road, while just dialling your phone makes an accident 2.8 times more likely.

The statistics speak for themselves, Flexed says, and show the need for a review of the law to prevent dozens – if not hundreds – of needless fatalities and life-changing injuries every year.

"The Melanies of this world need to be stopped before they kill somebody," Hall says, "And if that means locking a few people up as an example, then that can only be a good thing.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Airborne traffic monitoring - the future?
    March 1, 2013
    A new frontier in the quest to monitor road traffic is opening up… but using airborne drones to reduce the jams comes with some thorny issues. Chris Tindall reports. Imagine if you could rely on a system that provided all the data you needed to regulate traffic flow, route vehicles and respond swiftly to emergencies for a fraction of the cost of piloting a helicopter. That system exists, but as engineers and traffic managers start to explore the potential of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) – more commonly k
  • Bedfordshire police speed camera proposals ‘unhelpful’
    November 9, 2015
    A UK enforcement expert and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding. Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more c
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
  • DSRC? ‘It’s become a faith-based thing’
    March 2, 2021
    The US FCC’s decision on 5.9GHz led to Applied Information offering DSRC buybacks to DoTs. Bryan Mulligan tells Adam Hill that we now just need to get on and roll out CV technology...