Skip to main content

Partial victory for wheelchair user over bus access

A wheelchair user has won a partial victory at the UK Supreme Court over priority use of wheelchair spaces on buses. The case arose when wheelchair user Doug Paulley attempted to board a bus operated by FirstGroup, which carried a sign asking passengers occupying the wheelchair space to “please give up this space if needed for a wheelchair user”. The wheelchair space was occupied by a woman with a baby in a pushchair who refused to move when the driver asked her to. The driver took no further action and
January 18, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
A wheelchair user has won a partial victory at the UK Supreme Court over priority use of wheelchair spaces on buses. The case arose when wheelchair user Doug Paulley attempted to board a bus operated by FirstGroup, which carried a sign asking passengers occupying the wheelchair space to “please give up this space if needed for a wheelchair user”.

The wheelchair space was occupied by a woman with a baby in a pushchair who refused to move when the driver asked her to. The driver took no further action and Paulley was unable to board the bus. He sued the FirstGroup for unlawful discrimination, arguing that its "requesting, not requiring" policy was discriminatory.

The Supreme Court allowed Mr Paulley’s appeal, but only to a limited extent.  It ruled that FirstGroup’s policy of requiring a driver to simply request a non-wheelchair user to vacate a wheelchair space without taking any further steps was unjustified. It said the driver should consider further steps to pressurise the non-wheelchair user to vacate the space, depending on the circumstances.

Following the judgment, managing director of First Bus, Giles Fearnley said the group welcomed the court’s decision. He continued, “It has ruled that bus drivers are not required to remove customers from vehicles, which was a key issue for us. This provides welcome clarity for bus operators, our drivers and our customers.”

He went on to say that the Group looks forward to receiving further clarity around the decision and will implement any necessary changes when the Court publishes its Order.

“We recognise how important it is that bus services are accessible for all customers and we lead the industry in improving bus travel for customers with all disabilities.  We are therefore also pleased that the Supreme Court found that we did not discriminate against Mr Paulley.”

Related Content

  • June 17, 2016
    Sampo Hietanen’s mobility mission
    For a decade Sampo Hietanen harboured a vision of an alternative form of mobility, now as CEO of MaaS Finland he is putting theory into practice. Sampo Hietanen has become the embodiment of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – a concept he created 10 years ago while working for Finnish civil engineering giant Destia. “I had been working with the mobile sector on traffic information and started thinking what will happen when this becomes bigger,” he says.
  • January 8, 2024
    How to overcome the technical and commercial challenges of MaaS
    The UK government has attempted to unleash the possibilities of MaaS with the publication of a code of practice. Alan Dron takes look at how it might help encourage implementation
  • January 31, 2023
    EIT Mobility’s A-Z of Uvar
    Well-implemented vehicle mobility schemes offer cities quick ways to improve the quality of urban life - and now EIT Mobility has written a guide to doing so. Andrew Stone has a read…
  • April 7, 2014
    America fires V2V starting gun
    Leo McCloskey, ITS America’s senior vice president for Technical Programs, talks to Jason Barnes about what the recent NHTSA ruling on light vehicle connectivity means for cooperative infrastructures in North America. In early February the US Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it had decided to start taking steps to enable Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication technology for light vehicles. In so doing, the many safety-related applicati