Skip to main content

Partial victory for wheelchair user over bus access

A wheelchair user has won a partial victory at the UK Supreme Court over priority use of wheelchair spaces on buses. The case arose when wheelchair user Doug Paulley attempted to board a bus operated by FirstGroup, which carried a sign asking passengers occupying the wheelchair space to “please give up this space if needed for a wheelchair user”. The wheelchair space was occupied by a woman with a baby in a pushchair who refused to move when the driver asked her to. The driver took no further action and
January 18, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
A wheelchair user has won a partial victory at the UK Supreme Court over priority use of wheelchair spaces on buses. The case arose when wheelchair user Doug Paulley attempted to board a bus operated by FirstGroup, which carried a sign asking passengers occupying the wheelchair space to “please give up this space if needed for a wheelchair user”.

The wheelchair space was occupied by a woman with a baby in a pushchair who refused to move when the driver asked her to. The driver took no further action and Paulley was unable to board the bus. He sued the FirstGroup for unlawful discrimination, arguing that its "requesting, not requiring" policy was discriminatory.

The Supreme Court allowed Mr Paulley’s appeal, but only to a limited extent.  It ruled that FirstGroup’s policy of requiring a driver to simply request a non-wheelchair user to vacate a wheelchair space without taking any further steps was unjustified. It said the driver should consider further steps to pressurise the non-wheelchair user to vacate the space, depending on the circumstances.

Following the judgment, managing director of First Bus, Giles Fearnley said the group welcomed the court’s decision. He continued, “It has ruled that bus drivers are not required to remove customers from vehicles, which was a key issue for us. This provides welcome clarity for bus operators, our drivers and our customers.”

He went on to say that the Group looks forward to receiving further clarity around the decision and will implement any necessary changes when the Court publishes its Order.

“We recognise how important it is that bus services are accessible for all customers and we lead the industry in improving bus travel for customers with all disabilities.  We are therefore also pleased that the Supreme Court found that we did not discriminate against Mr Paulley.”
UTC

Related Content

  • August 16, 2013
    Drunk driver can sue power company for accident
    The Washington State Supreme Court has ruled that a drunk driver and her passenger can sue the county and a utility company for a 2005 car crash, overturning a lower court's decision in a case involving a 2005 crash. The Supreme Court ruled that government entities have a duty to ensure roads are reasonably safe for public travel, even if the driver is at fault. The controversial decision means cities, counties and utility companies can be held liable when faulty road designs lead to injuries in car crashes
  • February 3, 2012
    Does enforcement merit a place in the EU's ITS action Plan?
    Colin Wilson, IBI Group, looks at the implications for enforcement of the European Commission's new Action Plan for the Deployment of ITS in Europe
  • January 20, 2012
    Transport technology transforming bus stops in Los Angeles
    David Crawford reports on a pioneering blend of transport technology and aesthetic By gaining a design award before installation has even started, the US$6.9 million City of Santa Monica (California)'s Big Blue Bus Shelter and Branding Package has ensured early interest among what it expects to be a new wave of transit riders. The American Institute of Architects' Los Angeles chapter's recently conferred 'Next LA Citation Award for Architecture', given for design excellence in projects as yet unbuilt, comm
  • November 28, 2013
    Major setback for California's high speed train
    The future of the California high speed rail project hangs in the balance as a result of two rulings handed down by Sacramento Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny on 25 November. "The judge's ruling will prevent the [California High-Speed Rail] Authority from spending bond measure funds for construction until the funding plan is brought into compliance," said Michael Brady, co- lead attorney on the case, but because that would require finding at least US$25 billion in extra funds, Brady believes complianc