Skip to main content

NYC extends Brooklyn bus lane enforcement 

MTA New York City Transit, one of the main operating agencies of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), has extended its bus-mounted lane enforcement cameras to Brooklyn’s busiest bus route.
By Ben Spencer & Adam Hill February 27, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
NYC is extending bus-lane enforcement in Brooklyn and plans to add more routes as part of an $85m expansion (© Mikhail Leonov | Dreamstime.com)

The MTA began enforcement with Siemens camera systems on the M15, B44 and M14 Select Bus Service (SBS) fleets in Manhattan and Brooklyn last year in a bid to help clear bus lanes, speed up rides and prioritise transit on high-volume corridors.

MTA says bus speeds on the M14 have risen 55% since December 2018 as a result of the automated bus lane enforcement (ABLE) programme – although that only takes the average to 5.8mph.

The new route is the B46, which runs along Broadway, Malcolm X Blvd, Utica Av and Flatbush Av and connects to five subway lines and 30 bus routes. MTA says users will benefit from faster travel times when these dedicated lanes remain clear of traffic.

The system uses Siemens’ LaneWatch cameras, mounted directly on buses, to capture number plate details of vehicles that obstruct bus lanes while advanced video capabilities record photographs, videos and location information. Motorists who block a bus lane are subject to a fine. 

MTA says 9,700 tickets for violations have been issued so far – 8,700 of them on the M15 route.

The advantage to New York City Transit is that it would have required “substantially more surrounding static camera infrastructure in order to capture the same information”, says Siemens.

Michael Peter, CEO of Siemens Mobility, says the solution combines GPS, geo-fencing and automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) to ensure buses run more efficiently without being impeded by other vehicles in bus-only lanes. 

“By improving availability in the lane, it reduces commutes and can improve passenger experience on the more than two million daily bus trips served by their system,” Peter adds.

Craig Cipriano, acting MTA bus company president, said: “We recognise our current and potential customers’ desires to speed up the bus system, and continue to use the lessons learned from the M14 busway – namely, well-enforced bus priority - as the key to achieving a world class bus system that customers choose as their preferred transportation. The ABLE system truly makes bus lanes for buses.”

ABLE camera systems capture evidence such as licence plate information, photos and videos, as well as location and timestamp information, of vehicles obstructing bus lanes – but MTA insists that vehicles making permitted turns from bus lanes are not ticketed. 

However, motorists who remain in a bus lane without exiting at the first possible right turn, or who block the bus lane by two successive buses - are considered to be violating traffic laws.

During the initial 60-day grace period, motorists who block bus lanes are issued a warning that does not carry a fine. After that they are fined $50 for the first violation and $100 for a second, rising to $250 for a fifth violation - and for each subsequent one within a 12-month period.

The city’s 2020-24 Capital Plan includes $85 million for further expansion of the ABLE programme. Other strategies include redesigning bus networks to better meet customer needs, installing traffic signal priority technology, implementing more transit priority street designs and deploying new modern buses.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • AAA report: caught red-handed
    February 17, 2020
    Using published crash statistics, the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s report found that 939 people were killed in red-light running crashes in 2017 – a rise of 28% since 2012. Moreover, more than a quarter (28%) of crash deaths at signalised intersections “are the result of a driver running through a red light”.
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
  • New ANPR solutions overcome variables
    May 18, 2018
    The sheer range of variables makes it difficult to find a single algorithm to ensure a 100% standard of ANPR. David Crawford investigates new processing technology. Automatic number plate recognition (ANPR), using optical character recognition and image-processing to identify vehicles, plays key roles in traffic monitoring and law enforcement, access and parking control, electronic toll collection, vehicle security and crime deterrence. Overall, system performance is well rated, with high levels of
  • NEC to install traffic management system in India
    May 17, 2019
    NEC Technologies India is to install a surveillance system for traffic enforcement in the city of Gurugram and industrial town of Manesar. The NEC subsidiary says its cameras will be deployed across 115 sectors of both locations to also provide general surveillance. Takayuki Inaba, managing director, NEC Technologies India, says the company is working with Gurugram Municipal Development Authority to create a safer environment for residents. The video surveillance system is expected to help enforc