Skip to main content

NYC extends Brooklyn bus lane enforcement 

MTA New York City Transit, one of the main operating agencies of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), has extended its bus-mounted lane enforcement cameras to Brooklyn’s busiest bus route.
By Ben Spencer & Adam Hill February 27, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
NYC is extending bus-lane enforcement in Brooklyn and plans to add more routes as part of an $85m expansion (© Mikhail Leonov | Dreamstime.com)

The MTA began enforcement with Siemens camera systems on the M15, B44 and M14 Select Bus Service (SBS) fleets in Manhattan and Brooklyn last year in a bid to help clear bus lanes, speed up rides and prioritise transit on high-volume corridors.

MTA says bus speeds on the M14 have risen 55% since December 2018 as a result of the automated bus lane enforcement (ABLE) programme – although that only takes the average to 5.8mph.

The new route is the B46, which runs along Broadway, Malcolm X Blvd, Utica Av and Flatbush Av and connects to five subway lines and 30 bus routes. MTA says users will benefit from faster travel times when these dedicated lanes remain clear of traffic.

The system uses Siemens’ LaneWatch cameras, mounted directly on buses, to capture number plate details of vehicles that obstruct bus lanes while advanced video capabilities record photographs, videos and location information. Motorists who block a bus lane are subject to a fine. 

MTA says 9,700 tickets for violations have been issued so far – 8,700 of them on the M15 route.

The advantage to New York City Transit is that it would have required “substantially more surrounding static camera infrastructure in order to capture the same information”, says Siemens.

Michael Peter, CEO of Siemens Mobility, says the solution combines GPS, geo-fencing and automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) to ensure buses run more efficiently without being impeded by other vehicles in bus-only lanes. 

“By improving availability in the lane, it reduces commutes and can improve passenger experience on the more than two million daily bus trips served by their system,” Peter adds.

Craig Cipriano, acting MTA bus company president, said: “We recognise our current and potential customers’ desires to speed up the bus system, and continue to use the lessons learned from the M14 busway – namely, well-enforced bus priority - as the key to achieving a world class bus system that customers choose as their preferred transportation. The ABLE system truly makes bus lanes for buses.”

ABLE camera systems capture evidence such as licence plate information, photos and videos, as well as location and timestamp information, of vehicles obstructing bus lanes – but MTA insists that vehicles making permitted turns from bus lanes are not ticketed. 

However, motorists who remain in a bus lane without exiting at the first possible right turn, or who block the bus lane by two successive buses - are considered to be violating traffic laws.

During the initial 60-day grace period, motorists who block bus lanes are issued a warning that does not carry a fine. After that they are fined $50 for the first violation and $100 for a second, rising to $250 for a fifth violation - and for each subsequent one within a 12-month period.

The city’s 2020-24 Capital Plan includes $85 million for further expansion of the ABLE programme. Other strategies include redesigning bus networks to better meet customer needs, installing traffic signal priority technology, implementing more transit priority street designs and deploying new modern buses.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Redflex continues contract in Oregon  
    January 29, 2021
    Medford is one several Oregon cities to renew its automated enforcement deal
  • New legal basis brings EU wide cross border enforcement
    February 25, 2015
    Pan-EU enforcement is set to become a reality after legislation is revised. In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled that European Directive 2011/82/EU, which came into force in November 2013 to facilitate the exchange of information between member states in relation to eight road traffic offences, had been set up on an incorrect legal basis. The regulations had been introduced under police cooperation rules on the prevention of crime, but the Court decided that the measures in the Directive do not c
  • The weighty problem of truck routing enforcement
    March 17, 2015
    The growing impact of heavy commercial vehicles on urban and interurban highway infrastructures around the world is driving the need for reliable route access restriction and monitoring. The support role of enforcement is proving fertile ground for ITS development. Bridges are especially vulnerable – and critical in terms of travel delays. The US state of Oregon’s Department of Transportation (ODOT) operates what it claims is one of the country’s most aggressive truck route restriction enforcement programme
  • Ukraine invests in Kistler WiM
    June 24, 2021
    Eastern European nation will use Kistler WiM stations to tackle overloaded trucks