Skip to main content

New legislation leads to rise UK drug driving convictions

In his speech at the National Roads Policing Conference, Roads Minister Andrew Jones announced that 8,500 drivers were convicted of drug driving in 2016, the first full year since the legislation changed in March 2015. In 2014, only 879 drivers were convicted. The new legislation makes it illegal in England and Wales to drive with certain drugs in the body above specified levels, including eight illegal drugs and eight prescription drugs. Those caught drug-driving face a minimum 12-month driving ban, up
January 31, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
In his speech at the National Roads Policing Conference, Roads Minister Andrew Jones announced that 8,500 drivers were convicted of drug driving in 2016, the first full year since the legislation changed in March 2015. In 2014, only 879 drivers were convicted.

The new legislation makes it illegal in England and Wales to drive with certain drugs in the body above specified levels, including eight illegal drugs and eight prescription drugs.  Those caught drug-driving face a minimum 12-month driving ban, up to six months in prison, an unlimited fine and a criminal record.

Jones went on to say that £1m of government funding has been used to train 1,000 officers from police forces across England and Wales in ‘gathering evidence of impairment caused by drugs’.

He also talked to delegates about drink driving and mobile phones, reiterating that motorists caught using a mobile phone at the wheel face increased penalties of six points on their licence and a fixed penalty fine of £200.

He also said that although drink driving deaths have fallen by 80 per cent over the past 50 years, more needs to be done to maintain the progress. Since 2015, in order for high-risk offenders to get their licenses back they have to prove they are not alcohol dependant. In addition, drivers who fail a breathalyser are no longer automatically able to demand a blood test in the hope that they’ll sober up in the meantime.
UTC

Related Content

  • July 27, 2012
    Give offending drivers credit for good behaviour
    Andrew Rooke and Dave Marples of Technolution B.V. take a look at what can be done to address a long-standing problem: the all-or-nothing approach of automated enforcement. To start, a brief history of speeding: on 14 November 1896, the first Veteran Car Run was staged in England from London to Brighton. It was organised to celebrate new British legislation to raise the maximum speed of vehicles from four to 14mph while also removing the need for a person waving a red flag to walk in front of the car and wa
  • August 14, 2019
    British drivers face ban on hands-free mobiles
    UK drivers could be banned from using phones in hands-free mode, following a suggestion from MPs. The House of Commons Transport Select Committee has said that current UK law creates the “misleading impression” that the use of hands-free phones is a safe driving practice. However, there is increasing evidence to show that hands-free usage “creates the same risks of collision as using a hand-held device,” say the law-makers. In its latest report, Road Safety: driving while using a mobile phone, the
  • July 11, 2016
    Nine in 10 people want tougher sentences for drivers who kill
    A study to mark the launch of Brake’s new Roads to Justice Campaign shows there is huge support for strengthening both the charges and sentences faced by criminal drivers. Ninety-one per cent of people questioned agreed that if someone causes a fatal crash when they get behind the wheel after drinking or taking drugs, they should be charged with manslaughter. That carries a possible life sentence. At present people can either be charged with causing death by dangerous driving or causing death by careless
  • October 13, 2015
    Corruption corrodes confidence as ITS battles to improve safety
    News items and articles in this issue illustrate the highs and lows of ITS and the dilemma inherent in enforcement application. An IIHS report showing that speed cameras change motorists' behaviour beyond the immediate vicinity of the installations is further evidence of the positive influence the technology can have, however the guilty plea in the Chicago red light corruption case serves to undermine the entire concept.