Skip to main content

New legislation leads to rise UK drug driving convictions

In his speech at the National Roads Policing Conference, Roads Minister Andrew Jones announced that 8,500 drivers were convicted of drug driving in 2016, the first full year since the legislation changed in March 2015. In 2014, only 879 drivers were convicted. The new legislation makes it illegal in England and Wales to drive with certain drugs in the body above specified levels, including eight illegal drugs and eight prescription drugs. Those caught drug-driving face a minimum 12-month driving ban, up
January 31, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
In his speech at the National Roads Policing Conference, Roads Minister Andrew Jones announced that 8,500 drivers were convicted of drug driving in 2016, the first full year since the legislation changed in March 2015. In 2014, only 879 drivers were convicted.

The new legislation makes it illegal in England and Wales to drive with certain drugs in the body above specified levels, including eight illegal drugs and eight prescription drugs.  Those caught drug-driving face a minimum 12-month driving ban, up to six months in prison, an unlimited fine and a criminal record.

Jones went on to say that £1m of government funding has been used to train 1,000 officers from police forces across England and Wales in ‘gathering evidence of impairment caused by drugs’.

He also talked to delegates about drink driving and mobile phones, reiterating that motorists caught using a mobile phone at the wheel face increased penalties of six points on their licence and a fixed penalty fine of £200.

He also said that although drink driving deaths have fallen by 80 per cent over the past 50 years, more needs to be done to maintain the progress. Since 2015, in order for high-risk offenders to get their licenses back they have to prove they are not alcohol dependant. In addition, drivers who fail a breathalyser are no longer automatically able to demand a blood test in the hope that they’ll sober up in the meantime.

Related Content

  • December 4, 2012
    Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
  • June 11, 2019
    MaaS Market London: transport revolution
    ITS International’s third MaaS Market conference in London provoked lively discussions about micromobility, AVs, the stupidity of car drivers - and Star Trek. Adam Hill was taking notes…
  • June 5, 2015
    New technology could prevent drunk driving, say US officials
    The US Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has joined with members of Congress, safety advocates and industry representatives at the US Department of Transportation’s headquarters to highlight advances in the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) program, a research partnership between NHTSA and an industry consortium to develop technology to prevent alcohol-impaired drivers from operating their vehicles while under the influence. The event f
  • January 30, 2012
    In-vehicle systems as enforcement enablers?
    From an enforcement perspective at least, Toyota's recent recalls over problems with accelerator pedal assemblies had a positive outcome in that for the first time a major motor manufacturer outside of the US acknowledged publicly what many have known or suspected for quite a while: that the capability exists within certain car companies to extract data from a vehicle onboard unit which can be used to help ascertain, if not prove outright, just what was happening in the vital seconds up to an accident or cr