Skip to main content

MEPs discuss guidelines for drone use and safety

As commercial services using drones take off and their recreational use becomes ever more popular, it must be ensured that they pose no threat to public safety or personal privacy, said MEPs in a resolution passed on Thursday on the initiative of the EP transport committee. Drones, which could be used to provide various services, such as inspecting rail tracks, dams, and power plants, assessing natural disasters, crop spraying, film production and parcel delivery have great potential for stimulating economi
October 30, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
As commercial services using drones take off and their recreational use becomes ever more popular, it must be ensured that they pose no threat to public safety or personal privacy, said MEPs in a resolution passed on Thursday on the initiative of the EP transport committee.

Drones, which could be used to provide various services, such as inspecting rail tracks, dams, and power plants, assessing natural disasters, crop spraying, film production and parcel delivery have great potential for stimulating economic growth and job creation, MEPs say in the resolution, which was passed by 581 votes to, 31, with 21 abstentions, but safety, privacy, data protection and liability issues must be addressed, they add.

Policies should include privacy and data protection safeguards and drones should be equipped with ID chips and registered to make it easier to catch criminals who use them to breach privacy and data protection rules or commit other crimes. Drone ID chips would also facilitate accident investigations and help solve liability issues, say MEPs.

They ask the EU Commission to support research into ‘detect and avoid’ technologies to enable drones to avoid collisions with other airspace users or objects on the ground and geo-fencing technology to prevent drones from entering no-fly zones such as airports and power plants.

As current national authorisations for drones and their operators are not generally mutually recognised by EU member states, MEPs support Commission plans to propose EU-wide rules which would allow national authorities and other qualified bodies to handle validation and oversight activities. They also say safety rules should match risk levels and should distinguish between professional and recreational use.
UTC

Related Content

  • February 6, 2023
    Amsterdam Drone Week 2023: prep for take-off
    The fifth edition of the event takes place at RAI Amsterdam from 21-23 March 2023
  • December 1, 2017
    New EU wide rules on drone safety and privacy
    Drone operators and drones will need to comply with EU basic requirements on safety, security and personal data protection, following new regulations agreed by European Parliament and Council negotiators. The rules for the civil use of drones aim to bring a uniform level of safety and help boost the sector by providing greater clarity to manufacturers and operators. EU countries will need to ensure that operators of drones that can cause significant harm such as crashing into people, or present risks to
  • May 8, 2017
    European Accessibility Act ‘favours business demands; says disabled group
    The European Disability Forum (EDF) has reacted strongly to the recent EU vote which aims to make key products and services, like phones, e-book readers, operating systems and payment terminals, more accessible to people with disabilities, under new draft EU rules. EDF is an umbrella group representing 100 associations and some 80 million disabled people across the EU. The Internal Market Committee (IMCO) amended and approved the rules, which would apply only to products and services placed on the EU market
  • February 25, 2015
    New legal basis brings EU wide cross border enforcement
    Pan-EU enforcement is set to become a reality after legislation is revised. In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled that European Directive 2011/82/EU, which came into force in November 2013 to facilitate the exchange of information between member states in relation to eight road traffic offences, had been set up on an incorrect legal basis. The regulations had been introduced under police cooperation rules on the prevention of crime, but the Court decided that the measures in the Directive do not c