Skip to main content

MassDOT deploys adaptive traffic control

Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has selected Trafficware’s SynchroGreen for the State’s first adaptive signal system. With traffic engineering involvement from consulting firm VHB, the new system was activated earlier this year. Video cameras located at the intersection provide real-time traffic volumes information to on-street traffic controllers. The system then uses a centralised command and control server to process this volume/occupancy data to analyse and dynamically adjust p
July 1, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
7213 Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has selected 5642 Trafficware’s SynchroGreen for the State’s first adaptive signal system.  With traffic engineering involvement from consulting firm VHB, the new system was activated earlier this year.

Video cameras located at the intersection provide real-time traffic volumes information to on-street traffic controllers.  The system then uses a centralised command and control server to process this volume/occupancy data to analyse and dynamically adjust phase timings, offsets and cycle lengths continuously in real time.  This results in signal timings that adjust every cycle to the fluctuating demands of traffic volumes to optimise the flow of traffic.

SynchroGreen also provides users with the option of default settings or providing more detailed inputs to refine the system operation, offering a level of flexibility that allows system to be deployed in both smaller cities where there are little local resources to manage the system, or in larger cities, where there may be specific traffic dynamics that require a more tailored approach.

The system was deployed on a common bypass route where unpredictable traffic demand occurred, where backups caused substantial queuing onto the freeway. Commented Alan Deditch, president of Highway Tech, provider of on-street system support:  “SynchroGreen was the perfect solution to respond to the influx of traffic and we have already seen a significant improvement,” added Deditch.

Related Content

  • July 30, 2012
    Telematics standards need to evolve to keep up with technology
    Scott Andrews and Scott McCormick take a look at how standards development for the telematics environment needs itself to evolve in order to stay abreast of technological advances. While the road has been somewhat arduous, telematics has evolved from a research activity to a resource for fleet operators, consumers and road management authorities.
  • January 8, 2013
    Real time traffic control aids travel time reduction
    An IBEC working group session at ITS World Congress in Vienna in October was presented with an example of a very cost-effective means for reducing traffic travel time. There is no doubt that adaptive real-time traffic control is a very cost-effective ITS application”, Dr Ronald van Katwijk told an IBEC (International Benefits, Evaluation & Costs) working group session at the 2012 ITS World Congress in Vienna. The senior consultant with Netherlands consultant TNO and TrafficQuest, the Dutch Centre for Expert
  • January 24, 2012
    In-vehicle automation of safety compliance and other traffic violations
    David Crawford explores new initiatives in enforcement. Achieving the EU’s new road safety target of reducing road traffic deaths by 50 per cent by 2020 depends on removing legal and institutional barriers to the deployment of new enforcement technologies, stresses Jan Malenstein. The senior ITS Adviser to Dutch National Police Agency the KLPD, and a European-level spokesperson on road and traffic safety, points to the importance of, among other requirements, an effective EUwide type approval process for fr
  • August 19, 2015
    Costing transit is complicated case
    David Crawford welcomes fresh thinking from Canada. Public transit improvements can bring society “significantly more value” than conventional transport models normally indicate, argues Canadian researcher Todd Litman. “Traditional evaluation practices originally developed to assess roadway improvements, and focus primarily on vehicle travel speeds and operating costs. “They do not generally quantify or monetise basic mobility benefits, vehicle ownership and parking cost savings, or efficient land developme