Skip to main content

Imtech - update on the Fritz & Macziol Schweiz investigation

Following media coverage which contained allegations of unethical business behaviour, Imtech began an internal investigation into the former management of Fritz & Macziol Schweiz. This behaviour allegedly included excessive gifts and entertainment offered to Seco civil servants. The internal investigation initiated by Imtech was conducted by a substantial external team of lawyers, accountants and forensic experts. The office of the public prosecutor in Switzerland has also initiated criminal investigati
March 19, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Following media coverage which contained allegations of unethical business behaviour, 769 Imtech began an internal investigation into the former management of Fritz & Macziol Schweiz. This behaviour allegedly included excessive gifts and entertainment offered to Seco civil servants.

The internal investigation initiated by Imtech was conducted by a substantial external team of lawyers, accountants and forensic experts. The office of the public prosecutor in Switzerland has also initiated criminal investigations. Imtech is fully cooperating with the Swiss authorities.

The initial findings by Imtech confirm that a non-business relationship existed between the former management of Fritz & Macziol Schweiz and certain Seco civil servants. This was reflected in excessive entertainment, overly informal contacts and questionable business behaviour. A conflict of interest by Fritz & Macziol Schweiz management was also identified. Fritz & Macziol Schweiz is not a suspect in the Swiss criminal investigations at this stage.

Imtech’s investigations have not yet been completed due to the ongoing criminal investigation by the Swiss Authorities and it is therefore it is too early to draw final conclusions. Imtech will provide a further update at a later date.

The management of Fritz & Macziol Schweiz has been replaced. As a consequence of the adverse publicity, the organisation of Fritz & Macziol Schweiz is to be restructured. The potential financial exposure of the situation is difficult to assess, but judged to be limited.

Imtech strongly rejects any unethical business behaviour and has further tightened its already strict policies on matters such as sponsorship, gifts, hospitality and conflicts of interest.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Stocchi takes on transatlantic tolling tasks
    March 20, 2017
    We talk to Emanuela Stocchi, the first overseas-based female president of IBTTA and well placed to view tolling on both sides of the Atlantic. As incoming president of the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), Emanuela Stocchi aims to bolster the ‘international, mobility and connections’ elements of the US-based tolling organisation.
  • Road user charging potential solution to transportation problems
    December 14, 2012
    A number of new and highly significant open road tolling schemes have just been launched or are soon to ‘go live’. Systems of road user charging are flexing their muscles as the means to solve politically sensitive transportation problems, reports Jon Masters. Gothenburg, January 2013, will be the time and place for the launch of the next city congestion charging scheme in Europe. In a separate development, Los Angeles County’s tolled Metro ExpressLanes began operating in November 2012 – the latest in a ser
  • Dignity should be key measure of MaaS success
    December 4, 2020
    Money isn’t everything: what if we made dignity into the key measure of success for MaaS? Crissy Ditmore sets out her vision statement for the industry’s developers
  • Imtech reaches final agreement with its main financiers
    June 17, 2013
    After the identification of the irregularities in Germany and Poland, it became clear that Imtech was not going to meet its year-end 2012 financial covenants. On 19 March 2013, Imtech reached agreement with its main financiers on the provisional continuation of the outstanding facilities, and on 15 June 2013, the company reached final agreement with its main financiers regarding a waiver and amendment agreement for the outstanding facilities.