Skip to main content

'Half of US' fears Covid-19 on public transit

Nearly half of 1,000 Americans who took part in an opinion poll feel riding on public transit poses a high health risk due to the Covid-19 outbreak.
By Ben Spencer March 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Nearly half of Americans who took part in a poll worry about using public transit due to coronavirus (© Bigapplestock | Dreamstime.com)

Market research consultancy Northstar says its results show that up to 40% of Americans reduced their use of subways, buses and light rail as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
 
Jennifer Yellin, co-lead of Northstar's transportation practice, says public transit authorities are going to suffer revenue losses – which will affect the amount of ongoing cash available to upgrade and maintain systems.
 
“There is also the potential for increased traffic and congestion on roads, which could result in increased pollution and have longer-range environmental impacts,” she continues. “The ultimate question is whether these riders will return to public transit or stick with their cars long-term."
 
Other findings revealed that half the respondents are ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about coronavirus, and 47% believe that they are at least ‘somewhat’ likely to personally contract the virus.
 
Despite this, only 39% of participants aged 55 or over think they are personally at risk compared with 46% of 18-34 year olds and 53% of 35-54 year olds.
 
“This group is likely less concerned about personally contracting the virus due to their decreased mobility – as many are retired and are less likely to be travelling, including taking public transportation," Yellin concludes.
 
The survey findings come as pictures emerged of London’s Underground trains packed with commuters – despite prime minister Boris Johnson insisting that only ‘essential’ journeys should be made.
 
London mayor Sadiq Khan said: “I cannot say this more strongly: we must stop all non-essential use of public transport now. Employers: please support your staff to work from home unless it's absolutely necessary. Ignoring these rules means more lives lost.”

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • LA launches own ‘Green New Deal’
    August 15, 2019
    Los Angeles, once a temple to the automobile, has followed the Democrats in launching its own Green New Deal – and the city has made big pledges on urban mobility investment The Democratic Party has started something. The Green New Deal, one of whose most high-profile supporters is new congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, intends to persuade the public that swift action is necessary to combat climate change. Now the city of Los Angeles has followed suit, releasing what it calls ‘LA’s Green New Deal’.
  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • ITS investment on upward curve
    August 17, 2022
    More money is coming into the ITS sector – but where is it likely to go next? And what are the pros and cons of all this cash? Adam Hill talks to ITS veteran and corporate investment adviser Greg McKhann
  • NTTA: Diversity boosts access & opportunity
    November 3, 2021
    North Texas Tollway Authority has won IBTTA’s first Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Award. But what made the organisation’s focus on disadvantaged, minority and woman business enterprises stand out?