Skip to main content

'Half of US' fears Covid-19 on public transit

Nearly half of 1,000 Americans who took part in an opinion poll feel riding on public transit poses a high health risk due to the Covid-19 outbreak.
By Ben Spencer March 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Nearly half of Americans who took part in a poll worry about using public transit due to coronavirus (© Bigapplestock | Dreamstime.com)

Market research consultancy Northstar says its results show that up to 40% of Americans reduced their use of subways, buses and light rail as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
 
Jennifer Yellin, co-lead of Northstar's transportation practice, says public transit authorities are going to suffer revenue losses – which will affect the amount of ongoing cash available to upgrade and maintain systems.
 
“There is also the potential for increased traffic and congestion on roads, which could result in increased pollution and have longer-range environmental impacts,” she continues. “The ultimate question is whether these riders will return to public transit or stick with their cars long-term."
 
Other findings revealed that half the respondents are ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about coronavirus, and 47% believe that they are at least ‘somewhat’ likely to personally contract the virus.
 
Despite this, only 39% of participants aged 55 or over think they are personally at risk compared with 46% of 18-34 year olds and 53% of 35-54 year olds.
 
“This group is likely less concerned about personally contracting the virus due to their decreased mobility – as many are retired and are less likely to be travelling, including taking public transportation," Yellin concludes.
 
The survey findings come as pictures emerged of London’s Underground trains packed with commuters – despite prime minister Boris Johnson insisting that only ‘essential’ journeys should be made.
 
London mayor Sadiq Khan said: “I cannot say this more strongly: we must stop all non-essential use of public transport now. Employers: please support your staff to work from home unless it's absolutely necessary. Ignoring these rules means more lives lost.”

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS & Ethics: yes means yes
    March 4, 2019
    There is an increasing wealth of information available to create personalised transport solutions – and the possibilities are exciting. But, Andrew Bunn warns, ITS companies have a duty to be explicit in explaining what people’s data is going to be used for
  • Transit 'unprepared' for cyberattack, says MTI
    October 9, 2020
    Four in 10 agencies do not have cybersecurity action plan in place, researchers find
  • Picking it up as we go: how transportation agencies can learn from university research
    May 17, 2024
    JTA Research Lab has been created to identify critical transportation policy questions, and get academics to help solve them. Pencils sharpened? Nathaniel P. Ford explains…
  • Slow development of Europe's road user charging
    April 24, 2013
    Delegates convened in Brussels for Europe’s 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in March, when both positive and negative developments came to light for advocates of more widespread introduction of RUC. Jon Masters reports. Goings on across Europe in recent months have again demonstrated how very sensitive road user charging (RUC) is politically. At the 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in Brussels at the beginning of March, a Danish delegation was notable for its absence, but Belgian governme