Skip to main content

'Half of US' fears Covid-19 on public transit

Nearly half of 1,000 Americans who took part in an opinion poll feel riding on public transit poses a high health risk due to the Covid-19 outbreak.
By Ben Spencer March 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Nearly half of Americans who took part in a poll worry about using public transit due to coronavirus (© Bigapplestock | Dreamstime.com)

Market research consultancy Northstar says its results show that up to 40% of Americans reduced their use of subways, buses and light rail as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
 
Jennifer Yellin, co-lead of Northstar's transportation practice, says public transit authorities are going to suffer revenue losses – which will affect the amount of ongoing cash available to upgrade and maintain systems.
 
“There is also the potential for increased traffic and congestion on roads, which could result in increased pollution and have longer-range environmental impacts,” she continues. “The ultimate question is whether these riders will return to public transit or stick with their cars long-term."
 
Other findings revealed that half the respondents are ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about coronavirus, and 47% believe that they are at least ‘somewhat’ likely to personally contract the virus.
 
Despite this, only 39% of participants aged 55 or over think they are personally at risk compared with 46% of 18-34 year olds and 53% of 35-54 year olds.
 
“This group is likely less concerned about personally contracting the virus due to their decreased mobility – as many are retired and are less likely to be travelling, including taking public transportation," Yellin concludes.
 
The survey findings come as pictures emerged of London’s Underground trains packed with commuters – despite prime minister Boris Johnson insisting that only ‘essential’ journeys should be made.
 
London mayor Sadiq Khan said: “I cannot say this more strongly: we must stop all non-essential use of public transport now. Employers: please support your staff to work from home unless it's absolutely necessary. Ignoring these rules means more lives lost.”

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Are road user charging systems too complicated?
    February 27, 2012
    At any conference or exhibition, it tends to be the ad libs and asides, the departures from the scripted or official lines, which are the most telling. In mid-February, ITS-UK's Road User Charging Interest Group met in London. The event was no exception to that statement. Keith Mortimer, the Group's chairman, and his colleagues put together one of the better programmes on charging and tolling that I've seen in recent years. Sadly, however, the very positive presentations on deployments and technological pro
  • Auto-braking cars: government should meet motorists halfway
    March 25, 2014
    A UK Government incentive for drivers buying cars with anti-crash technology would save 60 lives and result in 760 fewer serious casualties reported to the police, in just three years. Over ten years, such an incentive would save 1,220 lives and nearly 136,000 casualties, according to Thatcham Research, the insurance industry’s automotive research centre. At a briefing seeking support from senior politicians, health organisations, insurers and vehicle manufacturers at the House of Commons today, Peter S
  • McKinsey reveals the $bns spent on mobility
    May 5, 2021
    Investors have poured nearly $330bn into more than 2,000 mobility firms since 2010
  • Don’t look at the jigsaw pieces – see the whole puzzle, says CCTA
    February 19, 2024
    There are three main barriers to taking transport ideas from the pilot stage to real-life usage: incompatible technology, local control and limited funding. Tim Haile of California’s Contra Costa Transportation Authority has some thoughts on how to overcome them