Skip to main content

'Half of US' fears Covid-19 on public transit

Nearly half of 1,000 Americans who took part in an opinion poll feel riding on public transit poses a high health risk due to the Covid-19 outbreak.
By Ben Spencer March 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Nearly half of Americans who took part in a poll worry about using public transit due to coronavirus (© Bigapplestock | Dreamstime.com)

Market research consultancy Northstar says its results show that up to 40% of Americans reduced their use of subways, buses and light rail as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
 
Jennifer Yellin, co-lead of Northstar's transportation practice, says public transit authorities are going to suffer revenue losses – which will affect the amount of ongoing cash available to upgrade and maintain systems.
 
“There is also the potential for increased traffic and congestion on roads, which could result in increased pollution and have longer-range environmental impacts,” she continues. “The ultimate question is whether these riders will return to public transit or stick with their cars long-term."
 
Other findings revealed that half the respondents are ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about coronavirus, and 47% believe that they are at least ‘somewhat’ likely to personally contract the virus.
 
Despite this, only 39% of participants aged 55 or over think they are personally at risk compared with 46% of 18-34 year olds and 53% of 35-54 year olds.
 
“This group is likely less concerned about personally contracting the virus due to their decreased mobility – as many are retired and are less likely to be travelling, including taking public transportation," Yellin concludes.
 
The survey findings come as pictures emerged of London’s Underground trains packed with commuters – despite prime minister Boris Johnson insisting that only ‘essential’ journeys should be made.
 
London mayor Sadiq Khan said: “I cannot say this more strongly: we must stop all non-essential use of public transport now. Employers: please support your staff to work from home unless it's absolutely necessary. Ignoring these rules means more lives lost.”

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Is the US economic stimulus programme working?
    January 30, 2012
    In this third installment in a series of articles exploring the impact of the US economic stimulus programme on the ITS industry, Pete Goldin reports on the ongoing debate in Congress about American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. A debate continues to rage in the US Congress and in the media about the effectiveness of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), and especially the timeliness of the ARRA payments. Some of the arguments seem somewhat partisan in origin while others point out fla
  • Personal sensor moves smart cities forward
    December 1, 2020
    Open-seneca is a portable air quality monitor designed to pinpoint emission hotspots and drive behavioural change - and Swedish capital Stockholm is trying it out, writes Adam Hill
  • Want intelligent transit? Then share data
    March 2, 2022
    How will the US deploy intelligent transit networks that enable connected vehicles? Data sharing is crucial if urban mobility users are to benefit, explains Timothy Menard of Lyt