Skip to main content

Government blitz on “disruptive roadworks” causing traffic jams in UK

Consultation may increase fines for companies whose street works overrun
By David Arminas January 17, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
“Too often traffic jams are caused by overrunning street works,” said Guy Opperman, the UK’s roads minister (image: Department for Transport)

The UK government has launched a consultation on further proposals to prevent utility companies from letting roadworks overrun and create traffic jams.

There is already a £10,000 per day fine for companies whose street works overrun on weekdays. The proposals would extend this from weekdays into weekends and national holidays.

The announcement concerning “disruptive roadworks” came on the UK’s annual so-called National Pothole Day. The consultation is part of a series of measures from the government’s Plan for Drivers, a 30-point document to support people’s freedoms to use their cars and curb over-zealous enforcement measures meant to curtail vehicle use.

The government said that the two million street works carried out in England by gas, water and other utility companies during 2022-23 have cost the economy around £4 billion through severe road congestion and disrupted journeys.

“Too often traffic jams are caused by overrunning street works,” said Guy Opperman, the roads minister. “This government is backing drivers, with a robust approach to utility companies and others, who dig up our streets. We will seek to massively increase fines for companies that breach conditions and fine works that overrun into weekends and bank holidays, while making the rental for such works help generate up to an extra £100 million to improve local roads.”

The consultation comes after the government introduced a performance-based “street works regime” to ensure utility companies resurface roads to the best possible standard and new lane rental schemes where utility companies can be charged up to £2,500 per day for street works.

The measures can also help boost active travel by preventing street works from disrupting walking, wheeling and cycling, while also providing opportunities to improve pavements and pedestrian crossings and make repairs to pavements and cycle lanes.

The proposals could also double fines from £500 up to a maximum of £1,000 for companies which breach conditions of the job, such as working without a permit.

The government plans would also direct at least half the money from lane rental schemes towards improving roads and repairing potholes. Lane rental schemes allow local highway authorities to charge companies for the time that street and road works occupy the road.

As a result, the measures could generate up to £100 million extra over 10 years to resurface roads.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ASECAP examines tolling’s trials, tribulations and triumphs
    September 4, 2018
    If you want to get up to speed on the main issues facing the transport sector and tolling companies, ASECAP Study Days event in Ljubljana was a good place to start. Colin Sowman reports (Photographs: Louis David). Increasing populations, ever-higher technical and safety requirements, and electric and hybrid vehicles will provide both challenges and opportunities for tolling companies. The annual Study Days event organised by ASECAP (the European association for tolling companies) examined all of these aspec
  • Make Thanksgiving roads safe: GHSA
    November 22, 2022
    Grants given to four states to avoid holiday season road fatalities - with help from Lyft
  • Benefits of car share quantified
    May 21, 2012
    San Francisco Bay Area had fewer greenhouse gas emissions and less congestion in 2010 due to City CarShare's (CCS) service. According to results third-party studies and 2010 CCS data, City CarShare members saved US$82 million (over the cost of car ownership) and contributed to a greener environment by reducing 60 million pounds of CO2 emissions last year. Additionally, City CarShare, a Bay Area nonprofit, stated it continued to achieve financial sustainability in 2010, ensuring the 10-year old organisation
  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions